查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Typology of Word Order in Chinese Dialects: Revisiting the Classification of Min
- 從日本吳音的形成及其現象看閩語與吳語的關係
- 閩語的三個本字
- 從方言比較論吳閩同源詞「摭」
- 論吳語閩語兩種表小稱義的語音形式及來源
- 韓國漢字音和中國方言的語音類似度
- 試釋《顏氏家訓》裡的「南染吳越,北雜夷虜」--兼論現代閩語的來源
- 吳語中的閩語成分
- 粵語閩語寫入詩詞--陳文巖作品為例
- The Geographic Distribution of the Diminutives in Yuebei Tuhua: A Compromise of the Conflict between Two Forces of Diminutive Formation in Southeastern Chinese Dialects
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | Typology of Word Order in Chinese Dialects: Revisiting the Classification of Min=漢語方言的語序類型:再探閩語的分區 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 姚玉敏; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
| 卷 期 | 15:4 2014.07[民103.07] |
| 頁 次 | 頁539-573 |
| 分類號 | 802.52 |
| 關鍵詞 | 粵語; 漢語方言分區; 閩語; 語序類型; 吳語; Cantonese; Classification of Chinese dialects; Min; Typology of word order; Wu; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 根據次話題優先,劉丹青 (2001a) 建議吳語和閩語是弱 VO 型方言,而粵語則是強 VO 型方言。本文考察吳、閩、粵在表示自移事件和致移事件時,趨向動詞/趨向補語和賓語(包括受事賓語和處所賓語)所顯示的語序。結果說明被調查的三個閩方言,包括福清話、惠安話、潮安話,所呈現的語序跟粵語的語序十分相似,而跟吳語的有相當大的差異。閩/粵語和吳語在語序上的差異進一步得到兩者對動後賓語的不同程度的包容性和使用前置詞或後置詞的差異的支持。本文認為閩語和粵語都是劉文所謂的強 VO 方言,而吳語則是弱 VO 方言。 |
| 英文摘要 | On the basis of the degree of subtopic prominence, Liu (2001a) suggests that Wu and Min are weak VO dialects, while Cantonese is a strong VO dialect. The present study examines the word orders exhibited by the directional verb/the directional complement and the theme object/the locative object in Wu, Min and Cantonese, when denoting self-agentive and agentive motion events. The findings of the study show that the word orders exhibited in the three Min dialects studied, namely Fuqing, Hui’an and Chao’an, closely resemble those in Cantonese, but differ significantly from the ones exemplified in Wu. The contrast between Min/Cantonese and Wu is further supported by their differences in the tolerance of postverbal object and in the use of preposition or postposition. The findings of the present study suggest that Min and Cantonese are strong VO dialects while Wu is a weak VO dialect in the sense of Liu (2001a). |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。