查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 衝球對國內優秀男子花式撞球選手九號球比賽勝負之影響=The Deciding Factor: Role of the Break Shot in Nine-ball Matches of Elite Taiwan Billiards Players |
---|---|
作者 | 陳冠列; 蔡政霖; Chen, Kuan-lieh; Tsai, Cheng-lin; |
期刊 | 運動教練科學 |
出版日期 | 20140600 |
卷期 | 34 2014.06[民103.06] |
頁次 | 頁71-81 |
分類號 | 993.5 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 開球; 母球; 勝負因素; 排球紙; 比球; Break; Cue ball; Winning factor; Magic rack; Banking; |
中文摘要 | 目的:探討衝球對花式撞球九號球比賽勝負的影響。方法:以2009年男子職業撞球大賽總冠軍賽的參賽選手為對象,針對所有場次共15場比賽的錄影轉播,記錄所有選手各種撞球技術表現,以描述性統計(次數、百分比、平均數及標準差)與t檢定,分析衝球對獲勝選手的影響。結果:經分析15場對戰賽事,衝球相關技術因子對比賽勝負的影響發現,各場比賽衝球局得分次數多與得分率高的選手勝率是100%;冠軍選手的衝球平均次數、衝球每場平均進球數、衝球局得分次數、衝球局得分率與一桿清檯次數為所有選手之最;獲勝選手在衝球局得分次數(8.33 ± 0.98 vs. 3.20 ± 2.68)、衝球局得 分率(0.78 ± 0.08 vs. 0.41 ± 0.27)、衝球平均次數(10.73 ± 0.46 vs. 6.00 ± 3.38)、衝球每場平均進球數(18.67 ± 2.90 vs. 10.53 ± 6.16)、衝球後連接球為機會球次數(7.80 ± 1.66 vs. 4.07 ± 2.63)、一桿清檯比率(0.50 ± 0.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.21)以及次數(5.40 ± 1.64 vs. 2.30 ± 1.91)明顯高於落敗選手(p < .05),衝球局平均進球數與衝球後連接球為機會球比率則無顯著差異。結論:提高衝球局的得分、增加衝球局的次數與進球數,以及使後續球型連接球多為機會球,皆是勝負的關鍵,除延續衝球局,亦大幅提升勝率,一桿清檯比率與次數個人技術才得以發揮。因此,在訓練時務必強化衝球的技能。 |
英文摘要 | Purpose: To investigate the effect of the break on the consequent of 9-ball matches using the competitors in the finals of the 2009 professional male billiards championships. Method: View video recordings of all 15 games from the 2009 professional male billiards championships and monitor qualitatively the performance of each competitor’s breaks (time, percentage, mean and standard difference), then conduct a t-test to determine the effect of the break on the outcome of the game. Result: Analysis of the break and its impact on winning showed that, in the 15 games, the individual with the higher numbers of scoring and scoring rate in a break inning had a 100% winning rate; the champion, out of all competitors, had the highest average number of breaks, average number of balls pocketed in a break inning, break inning scoring and scoring rate and the number of games won without sacrificing an inning. The winner of each game showed statistically significant differences (p < .05) against the loser in the factors of break inning scoring (8.33 ± 0.98 vs. 3.20 ± 2.68) and rate (0.78 ± 0.08 vs. 0.41 ± 0.27), average number of breaks (10.73 ± 0.46 vs. 6.00 ± 3.38), average object balls sunk in a break inning (18.67 ± 2.90 vs. 10.53 ± 6.16), number of object ball as chance after break (7.80 ± 1.66 vs. 4.07 ± 2.63), run out time (0.50 ± 0.16 vs. 0.30 ± 0.21) and rate (5.40 ± 1.64 vs. 2.30 ± 1.91). Conclusion: Increasing the scoring in a break inning, increasing the number of break innings and the number of object balls sunk, and number of object ball as chance after break, are all deciding factors. Not only do these extend the break inning, they also magnify the odds of winning immensely. Therefore, it is crucial to hone one’s techniques of the break and banking during practice. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。