查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 運用SOLO分類法探討科展活動之建模的類型--以八年級物理科展為例
- Identification of Multiple Linear Models for Nonlinear Processes
- 以監錄量測法發展的負載模型與參數確認
- 基於路況訊息分級之個人化駕駛輔助機制
- 建築師的繪圖板革命--建築資訊建模
- 都市自我組織--制度與空間演變的模擬比較
- BIM技術漫談
- 縣市層級之科學展覽活動應該提供參賽作品具體建議
- 系統層級功耗分析平臺設計
- Multiple Criteria Analysis of the Airport Terminal Effectiveness by Multi-objective Optimization and Simulation
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 運用SOLO分類法探討科展活動之建模的類型--以八年級物理科展為例=Using SOLO Taxonomy to Explore the Levels of Representation Models in Scientific Inquiry Activities: An Exploration Based on 8th Grade Physics Fair |
---|---|
作者 | 鐘建坪; 邱美虹; | 書刊名 | 教育實踐與研究 |
卷期 | 27:1 2014.06[民103.06] |
頁次 | 頁31-63 |
分類號 | 524.36 |
關鍵詞 | 事後回溯法; 建模; 科學展覽; 模型; SOLO分類法; Ex post facto method; Modeling; Science fair; SOLO taxonomy; Typology of model; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 模型與建模為科學實務的中心工作,而中小學科學展覽為最近似科學家的建模活動。本研究採用事後回溯法(Ex Post Facto Study)探討2位立意取樣之八年級學生歷經物理科展建模活動後所建構的模型表徵類型與其表徵模型階層。研究工具主要整合自模型表徵類型(Boulter & Buckley, 2000)與觀察學習表現架構(Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome, SOLO)(Biggs & Collis, 1982)分類階層形成模型種類與階層表。研究結果顯示學生在實驗室情境下建構模型的類型與其發展順序,包括:(1)在相同探究時期,學生可以建構出具體、動作、視覺、語彙與數學等多種具有目的性的模型;而在不同探究時期,學生主要從具體與動作表徵模型開始,接著建構視覺、語彙與數學模型的動態建模歷程,並依據先前建構的表徵模型從單一結構逐漸提升至延伸抽象結構;(2)學生經由不同的探究階段逐漸掌握科展主題探索的變因,包括纏繞物的種類、纏繞圈數、懸掛重量以及摩擦力等而形成自身對於科展主題的概念架構,並向外發展形成各種表徵模型。最後文末依據學生表徵模型建構次序,建議教師在設計實驗為主的探究相關活動時,應著重在具體與動作表徵模型的介紹,再逐步形成視覺與語彙模型表徵模型,最後形成數學模型。 |
英文摘要 | Models play a core role in science. Engaging students in science exhibitions is a way to involve them in modeling activities similar to those practiced by scientists. This study adopted the ex post facto method to investigate the types and hierarchical levels of modeling processes which were present in the scientific inquiry activities of eighth grade students. The authors integrated a typology of models proposed by Boulter and Buckley (2000) and Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy by Biggs and Collis (1982) to evaluate the typology of models used. The results revealed that (1) within the same inquiry phase, students constructed different types of representational models, including concrete, gestural, visual, verbal, and mathematical, each with a specific purpose. In other phases they constructed the same types from models that are uni-structural to ones that are extended and abstract. (2) Through various inquiry phases, the students gradually understood the variables of the project they worked on in order to develop a variety of corresponding representation models. Accordingly, school teachers are recommended to provide a progression of inquiry-based science activities that emphasize on introducing concrete and gestural representational models, forming visual and verbal models, and constructing mathematical models. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。