查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 規則依循與科學知識的社會學=Rule-Following and Sociology of Scientific Knowledge |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭凱元; | 書刊名 | 科技、醫療與社會 |
卷 期 | 18 2014.04[民103.04] |
頁 次 | 頁197-239 |
專 輯 | 《科學革命的結構》五十年專輯 |
分類號 | 541.1 |
關鍵詞 | 規則依循; 科學知識的社會學; 孔恩; 布洛爾; 類詞學; Rule-following; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Thomas Kuhn; David Bloor; Generics; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 後期維根斯坦的哲學論述對主張科學知識具有社會性面向的理論進路提供重要的資源與依據,從孔恩援引家族相似性的論理來支撐其典範概念,到布洛爾與林區訴諸對規則依循的不同理解來發展其各自的科學知識社會學與俗民方法論,均是其中具代表性的嘗試。有鑑於規則依循在維氏的論述裡比家族相似性概念更具基礎性與系統性,本文將聚焦於布洛爾與林區的著名爭論,透過庫許的相關討論及引進類詞學語意進路,來重估維氏哲學對科學知識本質的探討所帶來的影響。 |
英文摘要 | Philosophical considerations of the later Wittgenstein have provided important conceptual resources those who claim that scientific knowledge has a social dimension in nature. Kuhn’s appeal to the notion of family resemblance in the support of his idea of paradigm, Bloor’s and Lynch’s divergent interpretations of what rule-following involves are among some of the representatives taking this approach. In view of the fact that Wittgenstein’s discussions of rule-following are more basic and systematic than those of family resemblance, this paper will focus on the noted “Bloor-Lynch debate”. Aided by Kusch’s related discussions on this issue and by the considerations of a generic semantic analysis offered by Leslie and Cheng, this paper aims to re-evaluate the impacts brought about by the later Wittgenstein’s philosophy to the inquiry concerning the nature of scientific knowledge. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。