查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 經口內視鏡腺樣體切除術:汽化棒及動力旋轉刀之比較
- 經口內視鏡腺樣體切除術
- Combined Transoral Conventional and Endoscopic Adenoidectomy
- 早期聲門癌以內視鏡二氧化碳雷射顯微手術治療的長期追蹤結果
- Intraluminal Mucin Pool in Mucinous Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report
- Biliary Ascariasis Induced Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report
- Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea: A Case Report
- Evaluation of Topographic Gastric Histology in H. Pylori Infection--A Comparative Study with CLO Test and Bacterial Culture
- Pediatric Rhinosinusitis with Intraorbital Subperiosteal Abscess: A Case Report
- 應用內視鏡的探測來移除上顎竇內之牙齒殘根--病例報告
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 經口內視鏡腺樣體切除術:汽化棒及動力旋轉刀之比較=Transoral Endoscopic Adenoidectomy: Coblation vs Microdebrider |
---|---|
作 者 | 呂世運; 黃弘孟; | 書刊名 | 臺灣耳鼻喉頭頸外科雜誌 |
卷 期 | 48:4 2013.10-12[民102.10-12] |
頁 次 | 頁280-284 |
分類號 | 416.8 |
關鍵詞 | 腺樣體切除術; 內視鏡; 汽化棒; 動力旋轉刀; Adenoidectomy; Endoscopic; Coblator; Microdebrider; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of transoral endoscopic coblation-assisted adenoidectomy (TECA) compared to transoral endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy (TEMA).METHODS: We enrolled 60 children with obstructive adenoid hypertrophy in the study. All patients had chronic nasal obstruction; they were randomly classified into the TECA and TEMA groups, each comprising 30 patients. Using a 70-degree endoscope, the patients in the TECA group underwent adenoidectomy using an coblation transorally, whereas patients in the TEMA group underwent adenoidectomy using microdebrider transorally. Surgical outcomes were assessed with respect to operating time, blood loss, visual analogue scale, and saccharin test results. Assessments were conducted prior to and one year subsequent to surgery completion.RESULTS: The operative time for TECA group was shorter than that of TEMA (p<0.001). TECA group had less blood loss than that of TEMA group. (p<0.001) None of the 30 patients in both groups had postoperative hemorrhage. Compared to preoperative values, subjective complaints (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, and snoring) and saccharin transit time assessments all showed significant improvement 1 year postoperatively in both groups (p<0.001, for both). No significant difference was noted among the four parameters between TECA and TEMA.CONCLUSIONS: TECA was equally effective in relieving nasal obstruction 1 year after surgery compared to TEMA. Nonetheless, the operative time for TECA was shorter than That of TEMA. TECA had less blood loss than that of TEMA. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。