頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 劉師培「三《傳》《荀子》相通考」探析=The Study of Liu Shi-Pei's Comparison between The Three Hermeneutics of ChunQiu and XunZi |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 吳聲佑; | 書刊名 | 靜宜中文學報 |
| 卷 期 | 4 2013.12[民102.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁99-117 |
| 分類號 | 121.27 |
| 關鍵詞 | 劉師培; 三傳; 荀子; 荀學; 國粹學報; Liu Shi-Pei; The Three Hermeneutics of ChunQiu; ChunQiuSanZhuan; XunZi; The Theory of XunZi; Guo-Cui Journal; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 筆者檢視劉氏文本,釐清待議問題者有三。首探劉氏尊《荀》為「經」之因,究得清代「揚荀學風」、「荀子從祀」、「《荀子》升經」三端。次就「三《傳》《荀子》相通考」所論,評其可議者四端,分為「《經》目不一」、「『相通』義異」、「荀『說」、楊『注』混論」、「論述以偏概全」,以彰劉氏思慮未周處,則其申言「三《傳》《荀子》相通」之說,未能視為的論。末則呈現〈公羊荀子相通考〉與〈國學發微〉合讀比對之結果,得劉氏遺文〈說苑中有公羊義〉篇目,並校錄遺文二則附後,以資後世研究者參用。 |
| 英文摘要 | The author examined Liu Shih-Pei's essays, and has found three controversial problems.First, why had Liu Shih-Pei advocated "XunZi" at that time? Three reason are concluded:(1) In general, "XunZi"'s social status was promoted in the Ching Dynasty.(2) The Ching government venerated and began to worship "XunZi" in the Temple of Confucius.(3) The Book of "XunZi" was upgraded as one of the Classics.Second, the author reviewed Liu Shi-Pei's essays and analyzed four controversial statements.Through the discussion regarding the four problems above, Liu Shih-Pei's falsehood was obvious; therefore, his assertion about the similarity of "the Three Hermeneutics of ChunQiu" and "XunZi" was full of misgiving, which couldn't be a theory.Finally, the author compared <gong yang XunZi xiang tong kao> with <guo xue fa wei>, and then found <shuo yuan zhong you gong yang yi>, an article ignored by those who studied Liu Shih-Pei. It could be added to Liu Shih-Pei's publication category for future researchers to make further study. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。