頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 訴訟參加與第三人撤銷訴訟程序之研究(下)=A Study on the Intervention and Third-person Opposition Proceeding (2) |
---|---|
作者 | 劉明生; | 書刊名 | 輔仁法學 |
卷期 | 46 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁次 | 頁265-321 |
分類號 | 586.131 |
關鍵詞 | 訴訟參加; 訴訟告知; 法院職權通知; 既判力; 第三人撤銷訴訟程序; Intervention; Notice of action; Notice of court hearing; Res judicata; Third-person opposition proceeding; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國於2003年修正民事訴訟法時,於第67條之1增訂法院得依職權通知法律上利害關係第三人之規定。法院通知後具有輔助參加利益之第三人不參加訴訟,立法者認為於其與被輔助之當事人之間可發生參加效,如此之效力為舊法所無。此種情形於他造當事人與受通知之第三人間可否發生既判力與爭點效,於學說上則產生重大之爭論。2003年新法修正後,第63條第1項本文之規定,其究僅係參加人與被輔助當事人間發生參加效之根據規定,抑或可進一步作為他造當事人與參加人之間發生既判力與爭點效之根據規定,亦有其疑問之處。與67條之1法院職權通知之規定相配合,立法者尚於第57條之1以下增訂第三人撤銷訴訟程序,以供法律上利害關係第三人因不可歸責於己之事由未參加訴訟,致不能提出足以影響判決結果之攻擊或防禦方法之情形,得以兩造為共同被告對該確定之終局判決提起撤銷之訴,請求撤銷對其不利之部分。關於此項確定判決後救濟程序之增訂與訴訟參加、訴訟告知、法院職權通知,及再審之訴之關係如何,其原告、被告適格及其判決之效力之決定是否妥適,凡此均有作更深入研究之必要。基此,本文從比較法之觀點先探討訴訟參加、訴訟告知與法院職權通知相關之問題,其次再研究第三人撤銷訴訟程序之相關議題。本文之目的乃在釐清訴訟參加、訴訟告知與法院職權通知之要件與效力,及其與既判力及爭點效之關係,並確立確定判決前參加方面之聽審請求權保障規範及聽審請求權受侵害之確定判決後救濟程序。 |
英文摘要 | The written notice of court hearing has been added in 2003 in article 67-1 of Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure. If the third person doesn't attend the proceedings after the notice, the legislator regulates the effect of the intervention between the supported party and the noticed third person. Furthermore, this amendment raises the following important academic issues, whether res judicata and issue preclusion after the notice by court can occur between the another party and the intervener and whether article 63 can be regarded as a fundamental provision of above effect. The new proceeding, Third-Person Opposition Proceeding, is in the Innovation of 2003 introduced into the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure. In cases where a third person who is legally interested in an action and didn't attend the proceedings due to reasons not imputable to himself, such third person may bring an opposition action against that final and binding judgment to seek the revocation of the portion of such judgment prejudicial to him. It is necessary to make the detailed study, whether the standings of plaintiff and defendant in the third person opposition proceedings are adequate. The aim of the essay is to clarify the requirements and effects of intervention, notice of action, notice of court hearing and the relation between them and res judicata as well as issue preclusion and further to establish the provision of notice of court, which protects the third person's right to a court hearing, and the proper remedial procedure against the infringement of the above right. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。