頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中日傳統儒佛書交涉史概論=A Historical Survey of Traditional Values between the Sino-Japanese Confucian Texts and Buddhist Texts |
---|---|
作 者 | 林鳴宇; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷 期 | 10:2=20 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁 次 | 頁129-159 |
分類號 | 010 |
關鍵詞 | 儒書; 佛書; 漢籍分類目錄; 目錄學; 儒佛論爭; Confucian texts; Buddhist texts; Classified catalogue of ancient Chinese texts; Bibliography; Confucian-Buddhist debate; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 儒書與佛書作為東亞地區文化發展的重要產物,相互在千餘年間不斷鞏固各自的社會地位以及擴大對於民眾的影響力。而如何區別進而有效利用儒書以及佛書,古來東亞地區不僅儒人、釋子,更有政客、商人參與,使得兩者交流盤根錯節,難以一言以蔽之。本論利用古來東亞學術體系所創之「目錄學」之方法論,並精查古來東亞各種書籍分類目錄,以(一)日域儒佛書劃分之沿革(以《日本國見在書目錄》、《江戶時代書林出版書籍目錄集成》、《京都大學人文科學研究所漢籍目錄》為主),(二)漢地內外典論之發展,(三)儒佛論爭所衍生各種書籍定性之差異(引《龍龕手鏡》、《出定後語》、《儒佛問答》、《儒釋筆陣》為例)等三點,意欲概述中日古來儒書佛書分類之形成及其過程。 |
英文摘要 | More than a thousand years, the emerging of ”Confucian texts” and ”Buddhist texts” is the important achievement of the cultural development in East Asia. Both of which are also mutually reinforce their social status as well as to expand the influence. How to differentiate between these two kinds of texts becomes a major issue. In East Asian which constantly plagued Confucian, Buddhist, emperors, booksellers since ancient times.Based on methodology of traditional East Asia Bibliography, this study has examined various classified catalogues of ancient Chinese texts, three interpretations are as follows: 1. The history of the Confucian-Buddhist Text's classification in Japan; 2. The theoretical development of the Confucian-Buddhist Text's classification in China; 3. Differences in the positioning of ancient Chinese texts in Confucian-Buddhist debate.In light of the historical surveys, this study will clarify the some aspects of the Confucian-Buddhist Text's classification in China and Japan. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。