查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 2012年民事法發展回顧:民事財產法裁判回顧
- 消保法第七條與民法第一九一條之三對醫療行為適用之研析
- 病患手術後成為植物人,進而死亡的損害賠償責任--最高法院100年度臺上字第1214號判決評釋
- 人身傷害之微觀思維
- 土地法裁判精選:請求塗銷國有土地所有權登記--土地法第12條第2項規定回復所有權之爭議
- 論繼承回復請求權與物上請求權之關係--最高法院民國九十年度臺上字第四六四號判決評釋
- 初探個人資料保護法之特殊侵權行為要件
- 2011年民事法發展回顧
- 當事人協商與消滅時效制度--由德國經驗看最高法院九十六年度臺上字第二二五○號民事判決之珍貴啟示
- 消滅時效制度之整合與變革--歐洲契約法原則第14章及德國民法典修正之比較觀察
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 2012年民事法發展回顧:民事財產法裁判回顧=Developments in the Law in 2012:Civil Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳聰富; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 42:特刊 2013.11[民102.11] |
頁 次 | 頁967-998 |
專 輯 | 2012年臺灣法律發展回顧 |
分類號 | 584.2 |
關鍵詞 | 法律行為標的; 不法行為代理; 消滅時效; 誠信原則; 繼續性契約; 因果關係; 權利侵害; 給付關係; 不法原因給付; 舉證責任; 物上請求權; Objects of juridical act; Illegal representative; Statute of limitation; Good faith; Continuing contract; Causation; Infringment of rights; Performance relationship; Illegal cause; Burden of proof; Claim on property right; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在2012年期間,最高法院作成許多在民法理論發展上具有重要性的判決。具有新穎性判決者,如當事人合意依契約書的「附件」確定標的時,若該附件於訂約時不存在,即屬法律行為標的無法確定,致法律行為無效。又如給付不能所生損害賠償請求權消滅時效的起算點,應自債務人陷於給付不能時起算,再延長15年。此外,最高法院認為,不法行為所從事的法律行為本身,仍得成立表見代理,顯然變更過去的見解。最後,最高法院在高爾夫球會員俱樂部案件,認為不定期繼續性契約關係,會員具有任意終止權,得請求返還入會之保證金,具有保護消費者權益的功能。 |
英文摘要 | The Supreme Court declared many important judgments that had great impact on the legal theories of the civil law in 2012. They featured some key issues as follows.1. Newly developed doctrine: The Court holds that a contract is void where the ”attached document” indicating the distribution of properties is absent when it is entered into.2. Revision of former doctrine: The Court holds that the juridical act can be done by an agent acting without its authority even if it gets involved in a wrongful act.3. New doctrine distinct from legal theory: The Court holds that the statute of limitations for the claim on damages due to the impossibility of performance gets start to run from the time when the performance becomes impossible.4. New interpretation on the doctrine of good faith: The Court holds that it was not in violation of good faith where the plaintiff made a claim against the defendant even if 27 years had elapsed since the plaintiff made a claim last time.5. Protection of consumer's rights: The Court holds that a member of a golf club is entitled to terminate a contract at any time and to claim the recovery of his membership deposits paid since such a contract is a continuous service contract without specific duration of time. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。