查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 消保法第七條與民法第一九一條之三對醫療行為適用之研析=Application of Art.7 of Consumer Protection Act and Art.191-3 of Civil Law on Medical Disputes |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃立; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 75 2003.09[民92.09] |
頁 次 | 頁1-78 |
分類號 | 580.1641 |
關鍵詞 | 消費者保護法; 舉證責任; 瑕疵醫療行為與損害間的因果關係; 說明義務; 發展瑕疵; 消滅時效; 錯誤的出生; 錯誤的生命; 事實推定過失與因果關係原則; 合理期待之安全性; 產品流通進入市場; 告知後同意; Consumer protection act; Burden of proof; Causal relationship between the defective medical service and the damage occurred; Obligation to provide all necessary information and documentation to the damaged party; Development risks; Time-limits; Wrogful birth; Wrongful life; Res ispa loquitur; The safety which a person is entitled to expect; Putting product into circulation; Informed consent; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文先從理論面探討消費者保護法第七條對醫療行為適用的問題,將其區分為瑕疵醫療行為與告知義務之違反兩大類,分別說明其問題的所在,也比較了美國與德國對相關問題的處理方式。也由現行實務判決加以檢討,說明消費者保護法之適用在審判實務上的問題,依據個案的情形,加以分析整理。其次也討論民法第一九一條之三對於醫療行為適用的可能性,並就學說加以檢討。最後從醫療的社會面切入,分析醫病間緊繃關係的由來與期待。 |
英文摘要 | This paper first discusses in theory the application of Article 7 of the Consumer Protection Act on medical disputes, and approaches the issue from the standpoints of malpractice and failure to obtain consent, elaborating on their respective difficulties. Comparison is made with American and German practices. The issue is then analyzed through individual case judgements involving application of Article 7. Article 191-3 of the Civil Code, which closely resembles Article 2050 of the Italian Civil Code and the res ispa loquitor doctrine originating from the U.S., is also explored as a possible tool in medical dispute litigation, and its potential discussed under various schools of thought. The conclusion focuses on the tension between medical doctors and their patients. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。