查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 哲學家兼修辭家?論修辭學在霍布斯政治理論中的功能
- 逆反時光、探訪視覺:視覺語藝的古典脈絡與其示現
- 飲水由波:隱伏於紫柏真可禪教觀中的本質主義
- Bullous Retinal Detachment in a Patient with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- 前衛運動、現代主義與後現代主義(2)
- 急性挫傷性視網膜色素壞死--兩病例報告
- Choroidal Involvement in Wegener's Granulomatosis: A Case Report
- 從作文通病論大學作文教學之補救
- Fatal Pulmonary Embolism in a Child Undergoing Extra-Ventricular Drainage Surgery--A Case Report
- 老年性黃斑部病變之境界不明脈絡膜新生血管的灌流變化
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 哲學家兼修辭家?論修辭學在霍布斯政治理論中的功能=A Philosopher and a Rhetorician? On the Purpose of Rhetoric in Thomas Hobbes's Political Theory |
---|---|
作者 | 梁裕康; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷期 | 45 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁次 | 頁175-216 |
分類號 | 570.941 |
關鍵詞 | 湯瑪斯‧霍布斯; 修辭; 自由意志; 脈絡; Thomas Hobbes; Rhetoric; Free will; Context; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 霍布斯被描繪成一位根據嚴謹的科學方法以建構其學說的哲學家。然而史欽納(Quentin Skinner)從所謂的脈絡主義(contextualism)觀點出發,認為綜觀霍布斯的一生,科學並非如一般而認為地全方位決定其思想。除了科學以外,霍布斯還帶有強烈的人文主義(humanist)色彩。這種人文主義的影響,在他晚期也是他最成熟的著作《利維坦》(Leviathan)中表露無遺。史欽納認為,這種詮釋最重要的證據,在於霍布斯作品的敘事風格歷經了極明顯的轉變:由重視論證過程的嚴謹與否,轉向強調論證影響力的修辭(rhetoric)效果。本文嘗試對史欽納的說法是否能有效詮釋霍布斯,提出若干不同觀點。在認識論上,哲學家與修辭家無法被視為合成或綜合(synthesis)的概念,但是可以被視為行為者在不同的語言-遊戲中所扮演的不同角色。因此,史欽納所謂的哲學家兼政治家,必須是指後者。 |
英文摘要 | Thomas Hobbes' conception of scientia civilis has often been presented as if it is a straightforward application of his views about natural sciences. Quentin Skinner, according to his contextual analysis, contends that it is his humanist root rather than sciences that permeates through his later works, notably Leviathan. The most evident sign of this is Hobbes converting from science to rhetoric. This essay is to argue that Skinner's account of Hobbes can not sustain in the epistemological terms, since it is not compatible with Hobbes' view about free will. However, this does not prevent his argument from being valid in other terms, since in a sense rhetoric does play some pragmatic role in terms of speech-act theory. That is, Skinner's contextual analysis can account for the extent to which Hobbes's application of rhetoric is valid in different language-games rather than which his theory of rhetoric is compatible with philosophy in epistemological terms. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。