查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 洪良品的古文《尚書》辨真理論=Hong Liang-Pin's Theory of Authenticating Old Text Shang Shu |
---|---|
作者 | 曹美秀; Tsao, Mei-hsiu; |
期刊 | 臺大中文學報 |
出版日期 | 20131000 |
卷期 | 42 2013.10[民102.10] |
頁次 | 頁155-201 |
分類號 | 092 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 尚書; 辨偽; 辨真; 洪良品; 閻若璩; Shang-shu; Bian-wei; Bian zhen; Hong Liang-Pin; Yan Ruo-Qu; |
中文摘要 | 受清末至民初逐漸形成,並廣泛為學人強調的科學精神及方法之影響,今人對清代《尚書》學的關注,集中於與辨偽相關的成就,而忽略晚清《尚書》學可能的多面性,尤其是持論與辨偽相反的,對《尚書》古文諸篇之辨真相關著作。本文試圖回到清代的學術背景,考察《尚書》學的發展,並以成書時間較晚、資料蒐羅較齊備的洪良品為例,分析其對古文諸篇的辨真理論,同時與辨偽者之重要論點及考辨方法相比較,一方面打破既有看待清代《尚書》學的視野,而以較寬廣的角度,探討《尚書》學於晚清的發展情形;一方面藉由雙方論證方法之比較,提供觀察辨真及辨偽觀點的另一個視角。二者皆有助於吾人對清代學術史的建構與解讀。 |
英文摘要 | Contemporary ”Sang-shu” (尚書) research, affected by the scientific spirit and method emphasized by scholars from the beginning of the Republican period, has tended to focus on the fruits of bian-wei (辨偽). This has unfortunately led to a relative ignorance of the possible diversity present in late Qing dynasty ”Sang-shu” studies, especially the works concerning bian-zhen (辨真), which take the opposite view of bian-wei. To approach this lack in scholarship, this paper attempts to return to the background of the Qing intellectual environment to observe the development of ”Sang-shu” studies. I take Hong Liang-pin's (洪良品) works as my main example since they were completed later and integrate numerous materials. I then compare them with bian-wei works. In this way, I hope to break through the recent views of Qing dynasty ”Sang-shu” studies, and see its development from a wider angle to provide a new point of view from which to observe the bian-zhen and bian-wei debate. Together this will help us better construct and understand Qing intellectual history. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。