查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 第二波民營化:日本新公共服務供給方式之析探=The Second Wave of Privatization : Analysis of the Delivery of New Public Service in Japan |
---|---|
作 者 | 林淑馨; | 書刊名 | 空大行政學報 |
卷 期 | 26 2013.10 [民102.10] |
頁 次 | 頁35-52 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 民營化; 第三部門; 民間融資提案; 公共服務; 政府財政最佳支出; Privatization; The third second; Private finance initiative; Public service; Value for money; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 九○年代以後的民營化跳脫傳統以「二分法」的觀點來論述該議題的僵化思考模 式,而著眼於如何活用民間部門的特殊性,並進一步回歸民營化的目的,思考如何善 用民間部門的資源與活力,使其在政府所提供的公共服務中發揮不同的功能,以改善 公共服務的品質並減輕社會整體所擔負之成本,因而產生活潑、彈性、多樣等新的公 共服務供給方式,故也有人將此種新公共服務的供給稱之為「第二波民營化」。 在本文中,作者以日本型第三部門和民間融資提案兩種新公共服務的供給模式為 例,分別介紹其概念、特性、類型,以及成效與限制。研究結果發現,無論是第三部 門模式或是民間融資提案模式,其制度設計的原始立意都是希望引進民間的資金、專 業與技術,來達到保障公共服務供給之目的,尤其是第三部門更是被賦予公共性保障 的高度期待。但實施以後卻發現,公部門和私部門究竟有其組織設計的差異,前者致 力於公共性的保障,後者追求經營效益與利潤。在此組織特性衝突的前提下,將公部 門和私部門置入同一組織體系中,不論是第三部門模式或是民間融資提案模式最後恐 怕都難逃面臨組織文化衝突所產生經營效率無法發揮的命運。 |
英文摘要 | Since 1990s, the study of privatization has gone beyond using the rigid traditional “dichotomy” perspectives when taking approaching the issue, by thinking outside the box, government officials started to focus on how to use private sectors’ special characteristics wisely and return to the basic aim of privatization. government officials begin to think about how to make good use of the resources and vitalities of private sectors in order to deliver different functions within the public services provided by the government, and to improve the quality of public services and reduce the cost that have been bearing on the shoulder of the people at the same time, thus, forming a lively, flexible and versatile way of delivering public services, which is called “the second wave of privatization”. In this paper, the author uses Private Finance Initiative and Japanese-Type of the Third Sector as examples of New Public Service models, and introduces their concepts, features, types, outcomes and limitations. This study shows that although the original goal of the two models previously mentioned are to attract more private sectors’ funds, professionals, and skills, in hopes of guaranteeing the deliverance of public services. However, after implementing the models, the author discovers that because organization designing differentiated between public and private sectors; the former is committed to protect “publicness”, while the latter is after interests and efficiencies. When trying to put public and private sector within the same organization system, the contradiction of their organization characteristics makes it unlikely for the two models to help improve the efficiency under the public organization culture. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。