查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 探討圖形表徵與視知覺學習偏好對生物辨識學習之影響
- 中年級學童「部份-全體」運思的發展:文字題選圖與解題作業表現的差異
- 分數圖形表徵補救教學活動之實施與檢討
- 情境融入國一最大公因數與最小公倍數文字題補救教學之研究--下一站.北港
- 電子書在學習上的研究與應用趨勢之初探
- 人體姿勢偵測系統與無監督辨識學習
- The Gap between the Demand for Understanding Introductory Economics Textbooks and the Supply of High School Mathematics--Use Graph Representations as Examples
- 兒童對小心夾手安全標誌設計認知與創作之研究
- 自動化UAV巡檢測繪及港區構造物偵測--以臺中港為例
- 以圖形模型表徵解分數除法問題之研究--以臺中市一所國小六年級學生為例
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 探討圖形表徵與視知覺學習偏好對生物辨識學習之影響=Exploring the Effects of Graphical Representation and Preference of Visual Perceptive Learning on Learning Biological Recognition |
---|---|
作 者 | 林玉雯; 黃台珠; 劉嘉茹; | 書刊名 | 科學教育學刊 |
卷 期 | 18:6 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁 次 | 頁521-546 |
分類號 | 521.531 |
關鍵詞 | 視知覺學習偏好; 圖形表徵; 辨識學習; Visual perceptive learning preference; Graphic representations; Recognition learning; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討不同類型的圖形表徵與視知覺學習偏好對生物辨識學習之影響,以求達到促進生物圖形表徵辨識之教學目的。以某醫專三個班級159位學生為研究對象,研究設計共四階段:一、前測:以視知覺學習偏好問卷及血球圖形表徵辨識測驗施測;二、實驗處理:不同班級各別施以真實彩色、描繪黑白及描繪彩色血球圖形表徵的教學;三、後測:以階段一之血球圖形表徵辨識測驗再次施測;四、晤談:針對三個班級高、低分組各取2位(共12位)進行半結構晤談。研究方法為量化、質性並重,量化部分採比較判斷法、相依t考驗、單變項共變數(ANCOVA)及One Way-ANOVA分析。質性部分為考量12位半結構晤談學生的晤談內容與前、後測資料,以建構出圖形表徵辨識歷程。結果顯示:(1)高、低分組學生學習前之視知覺學習偏好分別傾向直覺式和分析式;(2) 3種圖形表徵對於辨識成效均達顯著;(3)高、低分組學生分別傾向循環式和線性之辨識歷程;(4)描繪圖形表徵可以有效改善低學習成效學生的認知負載。本研究亦據此針對教學設計與未來研究提出一些建議。 |
英文摘要 | This study aimed to investigate the effects of graphical representation and preference of visual perceptive learning on learning biological recognition in 159 medical college students from three classes. The study included: Stage 1, administration of a visual perceptive learning preference questionnaire and a recognition test for graphical representations of blood cells; Stage 2, students in different classes studied blood cells using different graphical representations (true color photographs, black-and-white drawings, and color drawings); Stage 3, the same recognition test was re-administered; stage 4, two students from high and low achievement groups in each class were interviewed. Quantitative data were analyzed using the law of comparative judgment, a paired t-test, ANCOVA and one-way ANOVA. Qualitative data were analyzed to infer the recognition process. The results showed: 1) before learning, high and low achievement students demonstrated analytical and intuitive learning preferences, respectively; 2) all three graphical representations significantly enhanced learning, 3) high and low achievement students tended to use circular and linear paths, respectively. Implications for practice and further research are discussed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。