查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Comparing the Job Aspects of Hospital Employees in Australia and Taiwan
- 當代華人的海外移民
- 探討澳洲、美國、與臺灣等三國學生之數字常識表現
- 邁向二十一世紀新新教育--從澳洲「關鍵能力」教育計劃試探臺灣的教改前景
- 臺灣、日本、美國、加拿大、澳洲有關門診、急診、住院診察費之比較
- A Decade of Taiwanese Migrant Settlement in Australia: Comparisons with Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Settlers
- Australian Perspectives on TMD and Its Implications for Taiwan
- A Comparative Study of Australia-Taiwan Relations and Australia-South Korean Relations Since the 1990s
- A Preliminary Study of Taiwanese Immigrants to Australia
- The Genus Anascirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), from Leaves of Ficus Trees in Taiwan, India and Australia
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Comparing the Job Aspects of Hospital Employees in Australia and Taiwan=比較澳洲與臺灣醫院員工之工作觀感 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 洪佳儀; | 書刊名 | 慈濟技術學院學報 |
卷期 | 20 2013.03[民102.03] |
頁次 | 頁45-57 |
分類號 | 177.7 |
關鍵詞 | 工作觀感; 醫院員工; 澳洲; 臺灣; Job aspects; Hospital employee; Australia; Taiwan; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究之目的在於比較澳洲與台灣醫院員工對工作的觀感。研究採用問卷收集資料,問卷發放對象分別為澳洲某大醫院及台灣某區域醫院,最後共回收261 份問卷,其中150 來自澳洲,111 份來自台灣。統計分析結果顯示,澳洲醫院員工不論是在士氣(Morale)、參與感(Participation)、重視度(Recognition)、及工作安全感(Job Security),都比台灣醫院員工顯著低了許多。藉由本研究之結果,希望提供國際化公司要注重不同文化背景員工的工作觀感,以期提供更好的管理方式。 |
英文摘要 | The objective of this research is to compare the satisfaction level on job aspects of hospital employees in Australia and Taiwan. A self-report questionnaire on ‘Employee Perspective’ was used to survey hospital employees in Australia and Taiwan. Overall, 150 questionnaires in Australia and 111 questionnaires in Taiwan were collected. Findings indicate that Australian employees had significantly lower job aspect levels than their Taiwanese counterparts. Three factors, namely morale, participation, and recognition, were identified to explain the differences. The forth factor, job security, however, did not show any significant difference between the two groups. Although different countries utilize management style differently, it is beneficial to compare employee satisfaction levels on their job aspects between countries, because practitioners may adjust their management styles based on the study results. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。