頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 《老子》論證=A Treatise on Laozi |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳錫勇; | 書刊名 | 中國文化大學中文學報 |
卷 期 | 25 2012.10[民101.10] |
頁 次 | 頁85-93 |
分類號 | 121.31 |
關鍵詞 | 老子; 郭店簡本; 帛書本; 王弼注本; 河上公本; 通行本; Lao Tzu; Chu Bamboo Slips Lao Tzu at Guodian; Silk book of Lao Tzu; Wang Bi's commentary; He Shang Gong's commentary; The current version; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《老子》有王弼注本,然今所見王弼注本有注文殘脫者,有通章無注文者,有正文與注文不相應者,是知今通行本非王弼注本原文也。《老子》有河上公注本,乃晉葛洪所偽造,署曰漢,偽造葛玄〈序〉,就其訛文可證該書成於王弼注本之後。今就河上本當在王本後;通行本正文非王本正文,舉例論證之,是為本論文也。 |
英文摘要 | In existent, some of Wang Bi's commentary is incomplete, and there are no comment on several whole chapters, as well as a few commentary do not correspond to the text. Therefore, the current Wang Bi's commentary doesn't conform with the original's. Besides, there is still He Shang's commentary, it was counterfeited by Ge Hong in Jin dynasty. Though he inscribed Han dynasty and Ge Xuan in the preface, it still be suspectable. It can be proved that the book appears later than Wang Bi's by finding out erratums. This thesis will principally exemplify: He Shang's text appears later than Wang Bi's, and the current Wang Bi's commentary is not original. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。