查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 香港中國語文教師對於給予學生「回饋」的認識與實施現況之研究
- Students' Views of Mathematics Learning: A Cross-sectional Survey in Hong Kong
- 香港中小學的科技教育
- 中學中國語文課程改革的反思和前瞻
- 香港中小學教科書的審查程序
- 試論香港中學中國語文課本之編寫方式及其內容--以「桃花源記」乙文為例
- 香港大專中國語文教學取向的思考
- 大學與中小學合作改進教育之一途--從香港經驗說起
- "通識"、"另類現實觀"與社會抗爭--1986香港JWMI潮中辯證及踐行的類幾何學
- 「中國語文及文化科」的課程設計與香港中文教學的發展方向
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 香港中國語文教師對於給予學生「回饋」的認識與實施現況之研究=Research on Hong Kong Chinese Language Teachers' Understanding of the Aims and Practice of Giving Students Feedback |
---|---|
作者 | 廖佩莉; | 書刊名 | 教育研究與發展期刊 |
卷期 | 9:2 2013.06[民102.06] |
頁次 | 頁65-89 |
專輯 | 課程與教學 |
分類號 | 523.311 |
關鍵詞 | 中小學; 促進學習的評估; 回饋; 香港; 中國語文; 學習理論; Assessment for learning; Feedback; Hong Kong; Chinese language; Learning theory; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討香港中國語文教師對給予學生回饋目的的認識和實施情況。研究採用定量研究和定性研究兩種調查方式。研究對象是香港中小學中文科教師。研究發現香港大部分教師是從學生角度去理解給予回饋的目的,但卻缺乏從教師和師生互動的觀點來探究。研究又發現中文科教師給予學生出的回饋是「質」「量」(指書面/口頭,分數/等級的回饋)並重的,但在實踐上卻出現理念與實踐的三個弔詭現象:1.教師認同給予學生回饋的重要性,但是教師卻不懂得怎樣給予學生有素質的口頭和書面回饋;2.大多數教師認同他們給予學生回饋能指導學習方向的重要性,也能向學生提供具體的改善方法,但有四成多教師給予學生回饋後,很少再作跟進;3.教師認同回饋能提升學生的反思能力,但教師在寫作範疇上給予學生的書面回饋卻是由教師主導。本研究最後提出一些建議。 |
英文摘要 | This study helps to explore Hong Kong teachers’ understanding the aims of giving students’ feedback and how they practice it. The study employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, with data being collected through questionnaires and interviews. Findings indicate that most Chinese language teachers have the students’ perspectives to understand of the aims of giving feedback to students, but lack of exploring the perspectives of teachers, teacher and students interaction of giving feedback. It is shown that many teachers have done in giving both oral/written feedback, marks/ grades feedback for students. However, some paradoxes exists: 1.teachers recognize the importance of giving feedback, but they do not know how to give good quality of oral and written feedback to students; 2.most teachers can give students feedback with suggestions for improving their work, but more than 40% teachers do not follow up how students improve; 3.teachers recognize that students should develop their self-reflection abilities, but teachers’ written feedback for students in their compositions are teacher-centered. Then students have less opportunity to reflect what they learn. Some suggestions are made at the end of the paper. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。