查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 醫療契約在夫妻家務代理權的適用--德國及我國親屬法的比較
- 表見代理責任之排除--銀行「可得而知」辦理美金定存之代理權限不及於購買連動債券/臺高院100上202判決
- 論臨床助理制度之合法性及其弊害
- Nursing Intervention on Compliance to the Medical Regimen of the Hypertensive Patients
- 醫師說明、病患承諾與阻卻違法
- 醫療行為與醫療糾紛
- 為推展護理本土化奠石﹣﹣認識民間醫療行為
- 文化對女性乳癌病患醫療行為之影響
- 環境損害中多數污染源之組合形式及其在侵權行為法上責任歸屬之基本原則
- 醫療行為與消費者保護法服務責任之適用領域--臺灣臺北地方法院八五年度訴字第五一二五號與臺灣高等法院八七年度上字第一五一號(馬偕紀念醫院肩難產案件)判決評釋
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 醫療契約在夫妻家務代理權的適用--德國及我國親屬法的比較=The Application of Couple's Agency of Household Matters on Medical Treatment Agreement: A Comparison of Family Law between Deutschland and Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉昭辰; | 書刊名 | 興大法學 |
| 卷 期 | 12 2012.11[民101.11] |
| 頁 次 | 頁73-101 |
| 分類號 | 580.1641、580.1641 |
| 關鍵詞 | 民法第1003條; 民法第1003條之1; 家務代理權; 醫療行為; 連帶債務; 夫妻家務協力義務; 日常家務; 家庭扶養義務; Agency of household matters; Medical treatment act; Joint obligation; Household matters obligation by husband and wife; Household matters; Family maintenances obligation; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 醫療行為涉及個人的健康,而具有不可或缺性,但配偶的醫療行為往往也會對家庭經濟產生負擔,因此配偶的醫療費用是否在民法第一○○三條的家務代理權範圍?,因而另一配偶也必須負起連帶清償責任?特別是近來國人因無力繳納健保費用,而遭健保機關鎖卡,醫生在無得請求健保給付情況下,自是向夫妻二人求償,顯示本問題自有其實務重要性。以下本文即以此為討論題材,加以分析。 |
| 英文摘要 | Medical treatment activities involve personal health and become indispensable, however, the medical treatment on spouse also create economic burden to a family. In this regard, whether the treatment expenses of a spouse will be within the category of agency of household matters set by Article 1003 of the Taiwan Civil Code, so that the other party of the spouse shall be jointly and severally liable for the settlement of treatment expenses? Especially, some people are unable to pay health insurance fee and their national health insurance cards blocked recently. Under these circumstances, the medical doctors are unable to claim treatment expenses under national health insurance and turn to claim against the coupe. As such, this issue raises the practical importance. This article would like to discuss and analysis this issue. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。