查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Evaluation of Three Multiple-Choice Assessment Methods in a Human Factors Engineering Course
- 三種人因工程檢核表在半導體業之應用
- 使用情節對經驗法則評估法之影響
- 針對電子書為例之使用性人因工程評估初探
- An Application of Fuzzy Graphic Rating in Icon Design
- 紡織業與電子業的生產力和獲利能力之研究
- 行政法院迴避經濟社會文化權利公約之適用/北高行100訴118判決[裁判簡評]
- 國造軍用頭盔發展之評析
- 年輕人使用精簡型電腦之使用性績效評估
- 以本質較安全設計策略探討高科技製程設備人因工程改善可行性研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Evaluation of Three Multiple-Choice Assessment Methods in a Human Factors Engineering Course=三種多項選擇題作答方法在人因工程課程的評價 |
---|---|
作 者 | Ng, Annie W.Y.; Chan, Alan H.S.; | 書刊名 | 工業工程學刊 |
卷 期 | 29:7 2012.10[民101.10] |
頁 次 | 頁466-476 |
分類號 | 440.8 |
關鍵詞 | 評估; 多項選擇題作答方法; 信號檢測論; 人因工程; Assessment; Multiple-choice method; Signal detection theory; Human factors; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | This study investigated students’ objective performance and subjective preference for the conventional, liberal, and confidence marking multiple-choice methods. Eighty-one university students answered multiple-choice quiz questions on human factors engineering using each of the three methods and then provided feedback on each method. Relative to the conventional method, the liberal and confidence marking methods were useful for extracting information about partial knowledge and increased the variance of performance scores. The different multiple-choice methods could cause students to change their response criterion in performing the assessment, whereas the ability to discriminate correct answers from distracters did not vary across the multiple-choice methods. Regarding subjective preferences, the conventional method was the most preferred followed by the liberal method and then the confidence marking method. The findings of this study would be useful for the selection of effective multiple-choice methods for academic assessments. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。