頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論C2C網路拍賣服務提供者之商標間接侵權責任=A Study on Secondary Trademark Liability of C2C Online Auction Service Providers |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃心怡; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 24:2 2012.10[民101.10] |
頁 次 | 頁83-126 |
分類號 | 490.25 |
關鍵詞 | 網路拍賣服務提供者; 商標侵權; 商標間接侵權; 輔助侵權責任; 電子商務指令; 智慧財產權執行指令; 代負責任; 億貝; Online auction service provider; Online auction house; Trademark infringement; Secondary trademark infringement; Contributory liability; Vicarious liability; E-commerce directive; IPR enforcement directive; eBay; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 自2004年以來,拍賣網路服務提供者龍頭大老eBay,於美歐各地就其網站上發生之商標侵權行為陸續遭商標權人提起訴訟,請求eBay負民事損害賠償責任。美歐各國基於法令規範之不同,對於eBay應否負損害賠償責任,有相當紛歧之見解。本文擬從美國相關法制與代表性判決Tiffany(NJ)Inc. v. eBay Inc.,以及歐盟2000年電子商務指令(Directive 2000/31/EC, E-Commerce Directive)和2004年智慧財產權執行指令(Directive 2004/48/EC, IPR Enforcement Directive)之規定,與英國及歐盟法院對於L'Oréal v. eBay之二則判決,討論有關拍賣網站服務提供者間接侵權責任之原理原則,尋找出判決中共同之思維脈絡及考量因素。並從我國現行相關法律規定及司法實務見解,分析類似案件之可能審理結果。再參酌外國法制之思維脈絡,就我國之法制提出修法建議。 |
英文摘要 | Since 2004, eBay has been sued by various famous trademark owners for secondary trademark infringement occurred on its auction websites in United States and European countries. The courts in different countries reached different decisions on the secondary trademark liability of eBay. This paper discusses the principles and factors to be concerned in secondary trademark liability by analyzing three leading cases: Tiffany (NH) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2nd Cir. 2010), L'Oréal v. eBay, [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch), and L'Oréal v. eBay, Case C-324/09 L'Oréal v. eBay [2011] ECR I-0000, together with two EC directives: Directive 2000/31/EC, E-Commerce Directive and Directive 2004/48/EC, IRP Enforcement Directive.This paper also proposes some amendments to R.O.C. Trademark Act after analyzing current R.O.C. Trademark Act, R.O.C. Copyright Act and relevant court decisions and making comparisons with above-mentioned cases and EC directives. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。