查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 楊簡的覺悟經驗與神秘主義=Comparing Yang Jian's Enlightening Experience and Mysticism |
---|---|
作者 | 陳志強; Chan, Chi-keung; |
期刊 | 東吳哲學學報 |
出版日期 | 20130200 |
卷期 | 27 2013.02[民102.02] |
頁次 | 頁73-104 |
分類號 | 128 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 覺悟; 神秘主義; 楊簡; 史泰司; Enlightening experience; Mysticism; Yang Jian; W. T. Stace; |
中文摘要 | 廣義的儒家心學傳統以覺悟本心為聖學第一義的工夫,但這說法實非易契:覺悟所見「萬物一體」的境界應該如何理解?本心何以不學而能作出是非善惡的恰當裁斷?既然惻隱首先來自吾人主觀的經驗,則又何以能作「人皆有不忍人之心」的普遍斷言?當前學界已有不少學者討論到儒家傳統中這種難契的「神秘」面向。本文便是建基於這些前人研究成果的工作,我們嘗試指出:一、學界對於「神秘主義」一詞的用法有待釐清。二、儒家傳統與神秘主義確可在對話的過程中各自善化自身的理論。 |
英文摘要 | The Confucian School of Mind regards the Enlightening of heart/mind as the primary moral practice. Yet, it is not easy to articulate the rationale behind that: how could we make sense of ”Unity of all entities” during the Enlightening Experience? Why the heart/mind could judge between good and evil without learning? If compassion is a personal experience, how could we make the universal claim that ”all people have the mind of compassion”? There are already a lot of discussions from the contemporaries about such ”mystical” component in the Confucian tradition. This paper, based on these research achievements, is trying to argue that: 1. The meaning of ”mysticism” in the contemporary discussion needs better clarification. 2. Confucianism and Mysticism could strengthen their own theories by having a dialogue. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。