查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 黑暗時代的災害治理之哲學觀與方法論--我國與日本災後復原重建之比較=Philosophy and Methodology of Post Disaster Reconstruction Governance--A Comparative between Taiwan and Japan |
---|---|
作 者 | 李宗勳; | 書刊名 | 警察行政管理學報 |
卷 期 | 9 2013.05[民102.05] |
頁 次 | 頁25-51 |
分類號 | 548.31 |
關鍵詞 | 黑暗時代; 災害治理; 復原重建; 比較研究; Dark times; Disaster governance; Disaster reconstruction; Comparative study; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 911恐怖爆破後,風險與危險已非「排在那兒」(out there)而是「到處都是」(over there),進入黑暗時代的新生活典範。「黑暗時代」(Dark Times)隱喻第二次世界大戰時期歐洲的不幸和苦難,也同步指涉當前美國與中東部份國家間相互仇視及憎恨的狀態,以及不同族群間失去了對話的意願與相互接納的可能之互動關係等。在點亮黑暗時代的公共領域時仍須關注個人如何追求權益的自由。災害發生後造成災情,首要任務在於安定受災民眾生活,協助其重建家園。查我國雖現已有災後復原重建相關機制規範,惟仍散見於各法令中,尚無一套專門、常態性之完整體制運行。基此,為深入瞭解現行災後復原重建體制於莫拉克颱風災區運作之實際效益與問題,俾檢討改進以有效整合相關機制規範並予以法制化,提升整體作業效能,實有蒐整相關行動者的觀感與建議之必要。因此,為就前揭涉及災害防救法之中央災害復原重建等變動廣大、影響深遠之主要議題深入研析,以肆應實需並符人民期待,爰進行相關研究,期透過文獻分析、專家座談、災區復原重建訪視、深度訪談等多元資料研究途徑,蒐集前年曾發生重大災害之日本有關作法與規範資料,並應用科學研究方法,全面性分析比較我國與日本體制規範之優缺後,研提具體可行之災後復原重建對策法制建議方案。 |
英文摘要 | Last year, a major 9.0-magnitude earthquake occurred on March 11 in Japan, subsequently causing a 30-meter tall tsunami in at least 5 places and leading to extensive fires and mudslides. Not only were homes destroyed, but the Fukushima nuclear disaster also occurred. When the great compound disaster hit Japan, the Japanese media's self-regulated control impressed the public worldwide. In addition to the shelter location and access to messages about daily needs, private businesses provided refuges and free material goods to the victims. Japan's unity and resilience were admirable, and its disaster rescue systems are analyzed for comparison with Taiwan.Compared to other countries, Taiwan's domestic disaster rescue systems are more specialized, with different types of disasters falling under the responsibility of different ministry supervisors (for example, fires and earthquakes fall under the responsibility of the Department of Interior, floods are under the Department of Economics, and landslides are under the Council of Agriculture). Historically, when natural disasters have happened in Taiwan, information and resources related to the disaster relief system have tended to lack the proper coordination, which leads to the misallocation of resources, limited relief efficiency, and other questions so that timely rescues cannot be achieved and businesses and people suffer greater losses.This paper will compare operating circumstances of disaster rescue and rehabilitation systems in Taiwan and Japan, includes disaster rescue and social rescue in Taiwan need integrating through legal institutions, and learning from Japan's self-help, co-help, and public help, learning from Japanese disaster prevention plan that engages the whole citizen..Next our research team will conduct in-depth interviews to understand what effort has been taken and achieved what effect in Taiwan and Japan when magnitude earthquake event after two year. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。