查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 廢票為何發生?兼論臺灣選舉無效票之空間效應,1992~2008
- 投票行為之空間觀點與空間分析--以臺灣2004年總統選舉為例
- 臺中市搶奪犯罪熱點與犯罪區位之空間分析
- 一胎化政策與人口結構失衡:中國GIS經社指標資料庫應用實例
- 臺北都會區土地使用/覆蓋變遷驅動力之空間近鄰效果探討
- 選舉的空間因素:以三次總統選舉為例
- 應用空間迴歸分析臺中市長選舉投票率的空間效應
- 空間異質性檢測方法之比較及其在臺灣主要死因的應用
- Measuring Spatial Association--The Case of Aquacultural Land Use in Yunlin County, Taiwan
- 蘭陽平原養殖土地利用變遷分析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 廢票為何發生?兼論臺灣選舉無效票之空間效應,1992~2008=What Causes the Invalid Votes? With a Concurrently Discussion of Spatial Analysis of Invalid Votes in Taiwan's Elections, 1992~2008 |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄧志松; 吳親恩; 柯一榮; | 書刊名 | 選舉研究 |
卷 期 | 19:2 2012.11[民101.11] |
頁 次 | 頁71-100 |
分類號 | 573.37 |
關鍵詞 | 無效票率; 空間自相關; 空間異質; 追蹤分析; 空間迴歸; Invalid vote; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial heterogeneity; Panel data analysis; Spatial regression; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 有關選舉無效票(即廢票)的研究很少,主要原因是無效票比率通常不高,對選舉結果的影響不大;而且無效票一般被視為是「疏失」造成,並非選民「意志」的表現,因此很少人探討其發生的原因。作者考察我國 1992至 2008年, 37個不同類型的選舉,結果發現無效票率的空間分布並非隨機,且有一定的模式。不同類型的選舉,無效票率的高低有跡可尋,代表無效票率其實是可以被解釋的,其背後有社會與制度因素存在。經由無效票率的追蹤分析 (panel data analysis)後,發現選舉法規、選舉複雜程度、選舉受重視程度、選舉年度及經社背景變數(教育年數、老年人口、人口密度比及原住民人口比例),約可解釋 34%之無效票率變異。作者進一步以空間迴歸模型探討,發現無效票率存在正向之空間自相關情形,部分地區則有明顯空間異質現象,極有可能是該地區民眾長期對政治冷漠使然,如果我們要提昇民主的內涵,則這些無效票率特別高的地方值得關注。 |
英文摘要 | The issue of invalid votes receives few scholarly attentions. Many consider invalid votes as the result of unintended behavior and do not explore the factors that may influence the incidence of invalid votes. We examine 37 elections of different levels between 1992 and 2008 in Taiwan by using panel data analysis. We find that the distribution of invalid votes are not random but are influenced by institutional and socioeconomic factors. Regarding institutional factors, the elections codes, the complexity of elections, the importance of elections, and years after the democratic transition are the main influencing factors. Years of education, the percentage of elders, population density, and percentage of indigenous citizens are the main socioeconomic variables that affect the incidence of invalid votes. The two strings of factors can explain about 34% of the variance in invalid votes. In addition to the pooled OLS model, we also employ spatial lag model and spatial error model. The two models show that the distribution of invalid votes exhibit positive spatial autocorrelation. In addition, some areas also exhibit spatial heterogeneity, which is likely to be attributed to the alienation of voters in the districts. We might need to pay special attention to these areas to enhance the quality of democracy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。