查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 頭頸部電腦斷層攝影檢查操作技術之介紹與探討
- 頭頸部淋巴瘤之電腦斷層攝影
- 頭頸部淋巴瘤之電腦斷層表徵
- 探討頭頸部癌合併頸部淋巴結腫大的病患使用二次IMRT治療計劃之必要性
- 利用影像處理技術評估頭頸部CTA之診斷時效性
- The Lund-Mackay Score for Adult Head and Neck Computed Tomography
- Semi-quantitative SPECT/CT to Improve Detection of Head and Neck Cancer with Skull Base Involvement
- Perineural Spread of Recurrent Tongue Cancer Mimicking Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Identified by F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
- Xenon Ventilation Scan as a Functional Assessment in Bronchiectasis
- 二氧化碳顯影電腦斷層與二氧化碳顯影超音波於肝臟腫瘤之比較
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Lund-Mackay Score for Adult Head and Neck Computed Tomography=成人頭頸部電腦斷層中之Lund Mackay分數 |
---|---|
作者 | 陳建志; 陳登郎; 陳啟仁; | 書刊名 | Journal of Radiological Science |
卷期 | 36:4 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁次 | 頁203-208+a9 |
分類號 | 416.14 |
關鍵詞 | 頭頸部; 電腦斷層; Lund Mackay分數; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | In order to obtain an objective Taiwanese control Lund-Mackay scoring (LMS) dataset, we performed a retrospective study that involved 600 patients, who had undergone head and neck CT scans between July 1st 2008 and November 12th 2010. After non-adults (less than 18 years old) and those with rhinosinusitis, head and neck trauma, epistaxis or cancer with head and neck radiotherapy were excluded, 490 adults (248 males and 242 females) were enrolled for the study group. In addition, 119 adults (55 males and 64 females) were enrolled for the control group that had been diagnosed with rhinosinusitis and received the first sinus CT scans for workup of disease severity or presurgical evaluation. The right or left sinuses were respectively divided into six portions, including maxillary sinus, anterior ethmoid sinuses, posterior ethmoid sinuses, sphenoid sinus, frontal sinus, and ostiomeatal complex. The severity of sinus mucosal inflammation or fluid accumulation for the above six portions were unilaterally and bilaterally summed to respectively give separate unilaterally and bilaterally total LMS values. As a result, in the study group, the bilaterally total LMS obtained for the dataset was 0.96 ± 1.91 (mean ± SD) with a right total LMS of 0.46 ± 1.28 and a left total LMS of 0.50 ± 1.41. In the control group, the bilaterally total LMS obtained for the dataset was 8.72 ± 7.18 with a right total LMS of 4.35 ± 3.84 and a left total LMS of 4.37 ± 3.98. There were significant differences between the study and control groups in the unilateral or bilaterally total LMS. Therefore, when a patient’s bilaterally total LMS is great than 5 (mean plus 2SD is 4.78) or when a patient’s unilaterally total LMS is greater than 4 (mean plus 2SD for right is 3.02 and for left is 3.32), he or she is beyond 97.7% of the common population. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。