查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 保羅.田立克[Paul Tillich]神學人類學的存有論基礎、應用與評價
- 對拉納、田立克「神學人類學」的批判
- 與田立克對話--讀賴品超《開放與委身:田立克的神學與宗教對話》(香港:基督教中國宗教文化研究社,2000)
- Paul Tillich's Understanding of Theology: A Pneumatological Christological Perspective
- 保羅.田立克文化神學中之辯證法與存有論特徵
- 臺灣青年奮興現象所形成「後宗派」處境的神學反省
- 孔子死亡觀中的「終極關懷」--以《論語》為討論中心
- 對一種三一論與宗教對話話語的批判
- 淺析田立克「信仰與人格」理論
- 保羅.田立克「信仰的動力」與徹悟大師「信心的願行」之會通
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 保羅.田立克[Paul Tillich]神學人類學的存有論基礎、應用與評價=The Ontological Ground, Application, and Evaluation of Paul Tillich's Theological Anthropology |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 張哲民; | 書刊名 | 新世紀宗教研究 |
| 卷 期 | 10:4 2012.06[民101.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-33 |
| 專 輯 | 實存處境中的宗教向度 |
| 分類號 | 242 |
| 關鍵詞 | 田立克; 神學人類學; 存有論; 聖靈; 終極關懷; Tillich; Theological anthropology; Ontology; The Spirit; Ultimate concern; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 保羅.田立克的人學觀點雖是無系統地散見在其文章各處,但他以具體的 靈之臨在的存有論人觀,已然建構了一套以人性中自然的宗教傾向為本的神 學人類學。然而,這種把神學人類學化的努力,卻遭受不少質疑與批判;這些 嚴正之詞,雖然凸顯了基督教啟示信仰的正統與獨特性,但卻忽略了田立克從 宣教神學轉向辯護神學的背景因素與實存困境。當我們了解田立克的歷史背景 後,便會發現這些批判往往過於苛責而略顯不公。作為一位牧者,田立克試圖 與那些能與教會堪稱相互匹敵的世俗對手,尋獲一個能夠相互關連、對話的共 同基礎,以合於時代的語言,而非重複聖經章節與教義,來宣揚福音。這正是 田立克神學人類學的努力與動機。而他刻意選擇終極關懷的術語,以及強調聖 靈臨在的動態教會觀,不僅為現代世界中緊張的宗教與文化關係,提供了對話 的平台與和平的契機,更是他與正統主義者常造成宗教間緊張對立、唯我獨尊 的最大不同。 |
| 英文摘要 | Although the ideas of man are scattered in all of Paul Tillich’s writings, his ontological idea of person based on the concrete spirit presence obviously becomes a system of theological anthropology that religious life inclination is humans’ inherent life quality. However, Tillich’s effort to transform theological words into anthropological words incurred many critiques and suspicions. These solemn animadversions demonstrate the orthodoxy and uniqueness of revelation in Christianity; nevertheless, they usually ignored the realistic predicaments and historical background of Tillich’s attitude transition from kerygmatic theology to apologetic theology. Only if people realized the historical contexts would people find that these criticisms are often too severe and rather unfair. As a priest, Tillich attempted to find a common ground which can help Christianity to have dialogue and correlation with those emerging rival positions. It’s Tillich’s original purpose and endeavor to preach Good News in contemporary words and not to mug up disciplines or sections in the gospel. The most divergence between Tillich and orthodoxism is that the former chose the term “ultimate concern” on purpose and lays emphasis on the dynamic of faith and Ecclesiology based on the Spirit Presence, creating a possibility in peace and dialogue, but the latter held exclusive attitude, usually resulting in tense and opposition in this world. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。