查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 消費者債務清理之清算免責制度:以信用卡債務為中心
- 論「清算不免責」的再突破--兼論「奢侈行為」在我國消費者債務清理條例清算程序的應有地位
- 論破產法上個人債務清理之實務問題--兼論法國法對於我國實務之啟發
- 德國法關於消費者債務清理制度新舊規定--兼論我國消費者債務清理制度
- 「理性選擇」或「非理性選擇」?--論我國消費者債務清理條例的二元選擇機制
- 卡債債務人聲請更生程序之裁判研究
- 開啟消費者債務清理新猷--消費者債務清理條例部分條文修正內容介紹
- 卡債債務人聲請更生程序之裁判研究
- 論不得免責的債務類型--兼論對2016年債務清理法草案之多層次再建構
- 消費者債務清算程序之別除權--其價值顧慮及行使方法
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 消費者債務清理之清算免責制度:以信用卡債務為中心=Discharge in Consumer Insolvency: Credit Card Debts |
---|---|
作 者 | 沈冠伶; | 書刊名 | 國立臺灣大學法學論叢 |
卷 期 | 41:2 2012.06[民101.06] |
頁 次 | 頁591-646 |
分類號 | 586.373 |
關鍵詞 | 消費者債務清理; 清算程序; 免責裁定; 不免責事由; 不免責債務; 誠信; 浪費行為; 奢侈; Consumer insolvency; Liquidation; Discharge by judgment; Exceptions to discharge; In good faith; Extravagance; Luxury; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 〈摘要〉 本文就消費者債務清理之清算免責制度,從分析實務裁判出發,探討解釋論上合於立法者意旨之解釋方向及可能性,並思考在立法上有無修正必要性,以減少適用上之不明確性。消費者債務清理制度應置於消費者保護之整體法制度下予以思考及定位,在對於發行信用卡者如未有適當有效之法律上限制以保護消費者時,則在後階段之債務清理免責程序時,法院必須綜合判斷,信用卡債權人是否已審慎地提供信用借款並無浮濫或引誘情事,而債務人是否具有誠信並無濫用債務清理免責制度之惡意,始能平衡兼顧債務人、債權人之利益,及社會、經濟健全發展之公益。消費者債務清理之清算程序,係以免責之結果為原則,因此,關於不免責事由應予以嚴格解釋,但可考慮擴增不免責債務之種類,不過,新增之不免責債務亦必須與其他各款不免責債務具有體系及價值上相當性。 |
英文摘要 | Abstract This Article discusses the discharge of debtors through liquidation according to the consumer insolvency act. In order to reduce uncertainty when the act is applied, the interpretation corresponding to the intention of legislators should be first investigated and the necessity of ammending legislation by analyzing practical cases should be considered as well. The consumer insolvency system should be considered and positioned under the direction of the Consumer Protection system. When the law does not provide appropriate and effective restrictions to those institutes which issue credit cards, while also protecting sonsumers in the later stage of liquidation, the court has to determine whether or not the loans were provided without floating interest rates or incertives, and whether or not the debtor acted in good faith without intending to abuse the insolvency system. According to the consideration mentioned above, the debtors’ and creditors’ interests can be balanced with the benefit of social and economic development. Discharge is the principle of liquidation in consumer insolvency law. Therefore, situations in which debtors are not discharged, should be strictly constrained. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。