頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 東山國小與社頭國小校園植栽減碳效益調查分析=Study on the Benefits of Carbon Emission Reduction Made by the Vegetation Located at Dongshan and Shetou Elementary School Campuses |
---|---|
作 者 | 林忠義; 李仲堃; 黃慧萍; 謝明君; 呂博清; | 書刊名 | 健康與照顧科學學刊 |
卷 期 | 1:1 2012.02[民101.02] |
頁 次 | 頁25-47 |
分類號 | 523.3751 |
關鍵詞 | 校園植栽減碳; 綠建築; 綠化量指標; 二氧化碳固定量; Carbon reduction of school vegetation; Green buildings; Green production targets; The amount of carbon dioxide fixation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 過往校園綠化成效之優劣,常以植栽數量及覆蓋面積作為評量基準,但在綠建築解說與 評估手冊之綠化量指標要求下,除前述評量基準外,更須兼顧生態性及植栽減碳效益,以充 分發揮植栽功能,兼可避免外來物種之入侵。本研究調查結果顯示,東山國小內喬木具原生 種或誘鳥引蝶之比例為77.91%,具原生種及誘鳥引蝶之灌木比例為76.83%;另外,社頭國 小內喬木具原生種或誘鳥引蝶之比例為27.56%,具原生種或誘鳥引蝶之灌木比例為40.85%。 再深入比較前述資料得知,社頭國小因為基地面積較東山國小大,所以種植之植栽數量也較 多,惟其喬木所佔全校植栽比例僅為16.1%(喬木總數/(喬木加灌木總數)),相較於東山國 小喬木所佔全校植栽比例為20.8%,明顯較為不足。再利用綠化量評估指標進行評估後,得 知兩校園植栽之TCO2 皆大於TCO2C,雖符合綠化量評估指標之規範,惟東山國小之超出率 達132%,然社頭國小之超出率卻僅有1.03%;且該國小之基地內植栽配置對CO2 年削減率 亦僅6.38%,較東山國小對CO2 年削減率16.51%為低;相較於東山國小較小之校園面積,因 為選用較高比例之喬木、原生種及誘鳥引蝶植栽,不論在加計優待係數之植栽總CO2 固定量, 或基地內植栽配置對CO2 之年削減率,皆明顯勝過社頭國小。 由此可知,基地內植栽減碳效益及CO2 年削減率之良窳,除直接受到基地面積、活動人 口之影響外,更受到植栽種類、植栽配置及植栽數量之影響。當植栽配置得宜,選用種類多 樣並兼具生態性,不僅同樣可以達到美化校園環境之成效,更可以同時具備強大削減CO2 之 機能。 |
英文摘要 | In this study, we used the green indicator of evaluation manual for green buildings in Taiwan to analyze the benefits of carbon emission reduction for the vegetation placement at two different school campuses. In Dongshan Elementary School, we found the arbors with native species or trap birds and butterfly lead the ratio of 77.91%, and the plants with native species or trap birds and butterfly lead the ratio of 76.83%. Also, in Shetou Elementary School, the arbors with native species or trap birds and butterfly lead the ratio of 27.56%, and the plants with native species or trap birds and butterfly lead the ratio of 40.85%. Then we compared the above data further, and found the percentage of arbors in Shetou Elementary School and in Dongshan Elementary School vegetation were 16.1% and 20.8% respectively. The TCO2 values in two different school campuses were greater than TCO2C values, and met the standards. Further, as we checked the over rate values of TCO2C, Shetou Elementary School was only 1.03%, but Dongshan Elementary School reached the higher values of 132%. The annual CO2 reduction rate of vegetation placement in Shetou Elementary School was only 6.38% and worse than that in Dongshan Elementary School (16.51%). Finally, because of chosen a higher proportion of trees and vegetation with native species or trap birds and butterfly in Dongshan Elementary School, both of the amount of carbon dioxide fixation multiplied by optimization factor and the annual CO2 reduction rate of vegetation placement were significantly better than Shetou Elementary School. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。