查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Indigenous Psychology, Westernized Psychology, and Indigenized Psychology: A Non-Western Psychologist's View
- 心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題
- 三論本土契合性:進一步的澄清
- 我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學?
- 本土心理學的啟蒙觀:開展本土研究的一些教訓
- Towards an Indigenous Chinese Psychology: A Selective Review of Methodological, Theoretical, and Empirical Accomplishments
- 現代性的不連續假說與建構實在論--論本土心理學的哲學基礎
- 楊國樞編:《本土心理學方法論》
- 黃囇莉:《人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究》
- 黃囇莉:《人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究》
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Indigenous Psychology, Westernized Psychology, and Indigenized Psychology: A Non-Western Psychologist's View=三種心理學 |
---|---|
作者 | 楊國樞; Yang, Kuo-shu; |
期刊 | 長庚人文社會學報 |
出版日期 | 20120400 |
卷期 | 5:1 2012.04[民101.04] |
頁次 | 頁1-32 |
分類號 | 170 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 本土契合性; 本土心理學; 西方心理學; 西化心理學; 虛假本土心理學; 本土化心理學; Indigenized psychology; Indigenous compatibility; Indigenous psychology; Pseudo-indigenous psychology; Western psychology; Westernized psychology; |
中文摘要 | 在華人社會中,有三種心理學同時並存,即本土心理學(IP)、西化心理學(WP)、及本土化心理學(IZP)。從世界史的觀點來說,歐美本土心理學是在歐美社會文化因素的影響下形成。此種西方心理學傳入眾多非西方國家,逐漸形成不同的西化心理學。在有些主要非西方國家中,當地心理學者已在推動本土化的運動,自會形成本土化心理學。本文有系統地闡述三種心理學逐漸形成的歷程。三種心理學不只代表三類方法論,也形成三套心理學知識系統。最後將從知識論的下列六方面加以比較:文化基礎、創新方法、本土自主性、本土脈絡性、本土契合性、及本土應用性。 |
英文摘要 | Three kinds of coexisting contemporary scientific psychologies, namely, indigenous psychology (IP), Westernized psychology (WP), and indigenized psychology (IZP), can be meaningfully distinguished and defined. Historically speaking, IP, the first of the three, was directly and spontaneously generated under the sole influence of Euro-American sociocultural factors. This Western psychology was then imported to and implanted in many non-Western countries to form various kinds of WP. The WPs in some of the major non-Western nations have been gradually transformed into IZPs by local psychologists under the academic movement of indigenization. This article systematically describes the dynamic process of the successive formation of the three psychologies. These psychologies represent not only three disciplines but also three methodologies which, in turn, produce three distinctive kinds of psychological knowledge. The three knowledge systems are then compared in terms of such epistemological aspects as cultural basis, production method, indigenous autonomy, indigenous contextualization, indigenous compatibility, and indigenous applicability. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。