查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 論日本勞動組合法第7條第1款之不當勞動行為意思--從行政救濟與司法救濟分立的觀點出發
- 不當勞動行為責任之歸屬與績效考核不利益待遇之成立--評行政院勞工委員會102年勞裁字第6號不當勞動行為裁決決定
- 從日本法檢討我國工會法不利益待遇解僱之規定
- 不利益待遇之不當勞動行為
- 不當勞動行為案件中大量觀察法之運用--最高行政法院106年度判字第223號判決評析
- 雇主對不當勞動裁決委員會裁決決定解僱構成不當勞動行為之民事救濟程序--兼評臺北高等行政法院109年度訴字第1372號行政裁定及臺灣臺北地方法院109年度勞訴字第413號民事裁定
- 不當勞動行為法制之本土實踐觀察與爭議問題分析
- 團體交涉之不當勞動行為
- 日本不當勞動行為制度之研究
- 自閉症兒童瞭解他人錯誤信念缺陷之探究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論日本勞動組合法第7條第1款之不當勞動行為意思--從行政救濟與司法救濟分立的觀點出發=A Study on the Intention of Unfair Labor Practices from First Clause of Article 7 of Labor Union Act in Japan--From the Perspective of Separation between Administrative Remedy and Judicial Remedy |
---|---|
作 者 | 張義德; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 23:3 2012.01[民101.01] |
頁 次 | 頁41-78 |
分類號 | 556.84 |
關鍵詞 | 不當勞動行為; 不利益待遇; 不當勞動行為意思; 誤信; 處分理由之競合; Unfair labor practices; Disadvantageous treatment; Intention of unfair labor practices; Misbelieve; Mixed motives; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 立法院於最近幾年陸續通過了團體協約法、勞資爭議處理法與工會法(勞動三法)之修正草案並於去(2011)年5月同步施行。此次勞動三法修正的最大特色乃以美、日之立法例為參考對象所導入之「不當勞動行為制度」。而「不利益待遇」乃為在不當勞動行為中經常發生的類型,在判斷雇主的行為是否構成不利益待遇時,「不當勞動行為意思」之問題乃立於核心之地位並為重要的研究課題。日本以美國1935年的華格納法為藍本而於1949年的勞動組合法中導入不當勞動行為制度後,對於不當勞動行為意思之內容、雇主有不當勞動行為意思的同時也有可以將該不利益處分合理化的事由時之處理方式、當事人主觀的認識與客觀情事不一致之「誤信」時及因第三人之壓力而進行不利益處分時是否成立不當勞動行為、不當勞動行為意思的證明方式等五個問題在學說及實務上均累積了相當之成果,本文乃逐一分析與檢討。最後,將研究的焦點拉回我國,於分析實務目前對於不當勞動行為意思問題的處理方式後,就我國新勞動三法施行後對於此問題的解決參考日本之經驗提出若干之淺見,希望得作為未來裁決委員會成立後處理不當勞動行為事件之參考。 |
英文摘要 | Legislative Yuan passed the Revision of three major labor laws over the past few years: Collective Agreements Act, Settlement Of Labor Disputes Act and Labor Union Act. The revised laws have been put into practice in May, 2011. The most outstanding feature of the Revision is "unfair labor practices", which based on American and Japanese labor laws. Among unfair labor practices, disadvantageous treatment act is found most frequent. The intention of unfair labor practices is a major factor to judge whether an employer commits the act of disadvantageous treatment or not.After Labor Union Act (1949) in Japan was introduced unfair labor practices from National Labor Relations Act of 1935 in America, it has been accumulated plenty of achievements in both theoretical and practical aspects, including the following five major issues which will be discussed later in this article.(a) The definition of unfair labor practices(b) The way to deal with the employer who commits disadvantageous treatment withproper reason(c) Misbelief: Discoed of the understanding of the principal and the objective reality(d) If the disadvantageous treatment including the act done under the force of the thirdparty(e) The way to prove the intention of unfair labor practicesNext, let's shift the subject back to Taiwan. This article is going to analyze the cases related to unfair labor practices in Taiwan, based on Japanese experience mentioned above, apply the solution from the coming Revision to these cases. I hope this article will help the Labor Dispute Resolution Commission deal with the cases of unfair labor practices. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。