查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 對我國不動產租金管制法律規定之建議=The Suggestions of Rental Control in Taiwan Land Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭惠佳; | 書刊名 | 真理財經法學 |
卷 期 | 2 2009.03[民98.03] |
頁 次 | 頁207-235 |
分類號 | 554.8 |
關鍵詞 | 不動產; 租賃契約; 租金; 財產權; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 筆者經常接觸當事人辦理不動產租買契約之公證,當約定之租金超過法律所規定之上限,即土地及其建築物申報總價年息百分之十時,或顯較當地一般租金為低時,公證人有無義務要求當事人減少或增加約定之租金?又如果當事人不願意減少或增加時,公證人是否有義務向該管直轄市、縣(市)政府或當地稅捐稽徵機關陳報,請求政府機關依法強制增加或減定之?又當發生土地法第九十七條所規定之「城市地方房屋之租金逾土地及其建築物申報總價年息百分之十」情事時,公證人如尊重當事人契約自由,對於契約當事人約定租金之數額未予置嚎,而逕為租賃契約之公證,此舉是否違反公證法之規定?公證人有無違反應盡之闡明義務?實有討論的空間。因此,本文將介紹寇斯定理及有關保護財產權的財產法則與責任法則,並就兩種法則的適用時機分別加以說明。接著敘述我國土地法有關私人不動產租金管制之規定,再從經濟分析的觀點分析論述我國法律規定的必要性及妥當性。最後對修法方向提出建議。 |
英文摘要 | Is it a notary’s obligation to force the parties to adjust the rental when he/she sees the rental is beyond the limitation of law? Should the notary respect the Rule of contract freedom and ignore the content of the contract, or should he/she be responsible for explaining the regulation of lease when reading the inappropriate agreements between the two parties? This is the main motive for writing this article. The second part of this article introduces the Coase Theorem, and the Rule of protecting the Property Rights, i.e. Property Rule and Liability Rule, and then makes an explanation regarding to the circumstances of using these rules. Part three states the rental control in Taiwan Land Law, and then analyzes the essentiality and appropriateness by the viewpoints of Economic Analysis. The last part presents the amended suggestions as the conclusion of this article. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。