查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 醫師說明義務之探討=The Physician's Duty of Informed Consent |
---|---|
作者 | 朱義芬; | 書刊名 | 真理財經法學 |
卷期 | 2 2009.03[民98.03] |
頁次 | 頁31-61 |
分類號 | 412.21 |
關鍵詞 | 醫療契約; 說明義務; 病人同意; 病人自主權; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 未經過醫師充分說明下同意的醫療行為被視為有瑕症之醫療行為,此法則已在醫療先進之歐美各國發展多年,此即「說明後同意」法則之內涵。「說明後同意」法則之目的並非強調醫病的對立關條,而是期待醫病雙方在整個醫療過程,透過事前的充分溝通,在和協、互信的氣氛下,完成彼此預期的結果。 我國近年來,學者有關此一法則的論述逐漸增多,法院的判決也有重視的趨勢。然而,在立法上,修正後的醫療法、醫師法,雖已具備「說明後同意」法則之雛形,卻仍猶顯不足,與「說明後同意」法則之精隨仍有一段距離。針對此問題,本文對病人自主權的說明義務法則,透過國內外學說、實務看法,從醫生的說明義務、病患同意權的行使、到為違反此說明義務的法律效果提出介紹和分析。 |
英文摘要 | The doctrine of informed consent has been developed for many years in the Untied States and EU. Under this doctrine, a physician or a health care provider has a duty to inform hislher patient about the risk of the treatment Violation of this duty will lead to the torts or defective contract claims Recently, legislative in Taiwan has adopted this informed consent principle in order to provide more protection for the patient and to promote a beUer physician-patient relationship However, although the modified statutes have included the basic concept of the informed consent principle, those statutes do not well-defined the scope and the application of the principle. Hence, this article introduces and compares the content of the use of the informed consent doctrine in the United States and EU, from the physician's duty to disclose, the patient's exercise of hislher consent right to the legal effect for the breach of this duty. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。