查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 刑事司法互助與證據禁止=Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters and Evidence Prohibition |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 王乃彥; |
作者姓名(外文) | Wang, Nian-yan; |
書刊名 | 真理財經法學 |
卷期 | 6 2011.03[民100.03] |
頁次 | 頁95-125 |
分類號 | 579.95 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 刑事司法互助; 法的正當程序; 情資交換; Criminal justice mutual-aid; Due process of law; Intelligence exchange; |
中文摘要 | 刑事司法互助,除能滿足各國實現對犯罪的個別刑罰權需求,在國際合作抑制麻醉藥品的非法交易、人口買賣、組織性犯罪、掩飾犯罪所得收益以規避沒收的洗錢等,經常呈現為跨國性犯罪的不法行為方面,更具有重大的意義。不過,在致力於國際合作抑制犯罪的同時,不應忽略,將境外取得的證人供述,應用於刑事司法程序,對刑事被告受憲法保障的正當程序可能帶來的影響。此外,為抑制犯罪而展開的情資交換,尤其是著眼於防範洗錢,在國際間傳遞的財務等資訊,也會對個人資訊自決權構成莫大的威脅。基於此,在追求國際合作打擊犯罪的同時,及早建立有效防阻執法機關為處罰犯罪而便宜行事的完備法制,也是當前迫切的課題。 |
英文摘要 | Criminal justice mutual -aid is intended to satisfy individual penalty requirement . I t means a lot more, in addit ion, in terms of reduct ion of i l l egal i n toxicant t rade, population smuggling, organized c r imes , money laundry to cover up crime- associated income in an attempt to shun confiscation. Moreover, while we carry out international cooper ation to e l iminate cross-border c r imes, ( 1) how i s witness’ t e stimony derived overse a s , ( 2) how i s i t appl ied to criminal just ice procedures, ( 3 ) what impact i s i t o n t h e consti tutionally accorded protection on the alleged are areas tha t shouldn’t be i gnored. Intelligence exchange involving financial information transmission among nations is designed to inhibi t crime, especi ally on prevention of cr ime- related laundry, may pose serious t h reat to i ndividual discretion. Hence how to erect a complete legal framework prevent ing the law authori ties to resort to expediency in taking punitive measures is my concern and needs to be heeded. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。