頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 羈押決定之憲法審查標準探詢--以羈押實體事由及踐行程序為主=Discussion about the Constitutional Standard of Detention--Conditions of Substance and Procedure |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 謝秉錡; | 書刊名 | 真理財經法學 |
| 卷 期 | 5 2010.09[民99.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁157-206 |
| 分類號 | 587.833 |
| 關鍵詞 | 無罪推定; 羈押; 人身自由; 基本權侵害; 憲法審查; The presumption of innocence; Detention; The right of freedom; Invasion of human rights; Judicial review; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 羈押,是刑事程序中,對被告權利傷害最重大的基本權干預行為,民主國家憲法法院均認為羈押相關問題其實就是憲法問題。我國刑事法學者均以「無罪推定」原則出發,檢視羈押的程序及實體問題,但在歐洲人權法院及德國聯邦憲法法院卻發展出一套「基本權侵害審查模式」,來探究羈押的相關問題。 本文即係以討論二種審查方式何者較優為觀點,透過比較法學研究方式,分別說明歐盟綠皮書所列之無罪推定原則內容,與德國學者透過無罪推定原則所發展出對羈押決定的控制標準,及聯邦憲法法院與歐洲人權法院透過「基本權侵害審查模式」,對羈押決定的要求,再提出本文的見解。 本文最後其上開比較法研究結論為基礎,檢視我國法制中,對於羈押案件所應踐行的程序與實體條件的缺失,並就我國學說的相關爭議提出一些觀點。 |
| 英文摘要 | Detention, is the most invasion to the right of defendant, in the criminal procedure. According to the above reasons, the constitutional court of each democratic country in the world always regards the issues of detention as the constitutional issues. In Taiwan, the scholars researching Criminal Law basing on the presumption of innocence, review the related procedural and substantial questions.However, the European Court of Human Rights and German Federal Constitutional Court creat models of Judicial Review on the violation of Basic Rights, through which to research the issues about Detention. The points of Author depend on the discussion about which reviewing model prior to another, through the research of Comparative Law, explain that the contents of Green Paper declared by Comission Of The European Communities, depending on which, scholars in German develop the standards of custodial decisions. Besides, Author also explain the standard of Judicial Review on custodial decisions developed by German Federal Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights, and, the article will prove different points. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。