查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 國家創新能耐與績效之實證研究
- 系統動態觀點下國家創新系統之探討
- 國家創新能耐與經濟發展之實證研究
- 知識經濟時代的新治理模式--歐陸新治理(Modern Governance)的觀點
- 加強倫理道德為政府治理奠基
- 運用內部控制發揮政府監督、洞察及前瞻功能
- 政府內部控制之推動現況與展望
- 大數據時代的政府治理:美國馬里蘭州歐麥利州長的治理經驗
- 書評:Terry L. Cooper (泰力.庫柏) and Donald C. Menzel (唐納.曼佐), eds., «Achieving Ethical Competency for Public Service Leadership» (實踐公共服務領導力所需的德行能力) (M.E. Sharp, Inc., 2013)
- 強化政府之監督、洞察、前瞻責任
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國家創新能耐與績效之實證研究=An Empirical Study of National Innovational Capacities and Performance |
---|---|
作者 | 張書豪; | 書刊名 | 多國籍企業管理評論 |
卷期 | 5:2 2011.09[民100.09] |
頁次 | 頁45-58 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 國家創新績效; 科技能耐; 財務能耐; 政府治理; National innovation performance; Science and technology capacities; Financial capacities; Government governance; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 國家創新績效在國家發展中佔有相當重要的地位,透過持續性的創新以帶動國家的經濟發展。本文主要由不同的面向觀測國家創新能耐在國家創新績效上所扮演的角色,焦點在於國家創新能耐的形成以及對於創新績效的影響力。本研究認為國家創新績效不僅決定於科技能耐,更重要的是國家的財務能耐以及政府治理。國家創新能耐是一個多重的構面,牽涉到技術面、財務面與政策面,因此本研究由不同面向觀測國家創新能耐,並檢測其對創新績效之影響。在衡量上,科技能耐包括R&D能力、資通訊基礎設施、教育與技能發展;財務能耐是指創新財務支援;政府治理則包括法律與規範、司法獨立性與政府政策;而國家創新績效則以專利表現、科學論文表現與經濟表現衡量。資料來源以瑞士洛桑管理學院2000~2010世界競爭力年報為主,經由49個國家的實證,結果得知高、低科技能耐、財務能耐與政府治理在國家創新績效之專利表現與經濟表現有顯著差異,而高、低科技能耐在國家科學論文表現上則有顯著差異。研究顯示透過國家創新能耐的提升,以增進國家創新績效有其必要性。本研究試圖建立國家創新績效之關聯模型,並提出相關政策意涵與建議,以提供我國政府在提升創新能力時之參考依據。 |
英文摘要 | National innovational performance, playing an important role in national development, promote economic development in continual innovation. This research studies the role of the national innovation capacities in the national innovation performance from the perspective of difference dimensions. This study focuses on the formation process of national innovation capacities and its effect on innovation performance. This study argues that the performance of national innovation is not only determined by the science and technology capacities, but also for a very large part by the national financial capacities and government governance. Since national innovational capabilities are built up by multi-dimensions, involving in technology, finance, and policy, we examine national innovation capabilities from different dimensions and the effects of innovation performance. The measures of science and technology capacities are R&D capacities, information and communication technology infrastructure, education and skill development; financial capacities are innovation financial support; government governance are law and regulatory, justice independence, government policy; and national innovation performance are patent, scientific articles and economy. This study investigates 49 countries from 2000~2010 World Competitiveness Yearbook and indicates that patent and economy of national innovation performance have significantly difference between low and high science and technology capabilities, financial capacities, and government governance, and scientific articles performance have significantly difference between low and high science and technology capabilities. The results show that it's necessary to promote national innovation capabilities to enhance national innovation performance. This study attempts to build national innovation performance model to provide government some practical suggestions related innovation development. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。