查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩=The View of Moral Education of Shi Jing and the Characteristics of the Anti-Han School of Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃忠慎; | 書刊名 | 國文學報 |
卷 期 | 49 2011.06[民100.06] |
頁 次 | 頁87-106 |
分類號 | 093 |
關鍵詞 | 姚際恆; 詩經通論; 詩序; 毛傳; 鄭箋; Yao Ji-Heng; Shi Jing Tong Lu; Shi Xu; Mao Chuan; Zheng Jian; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 姚際恆與崔述、方玉潤並稱為清代獨立治《詩》三大家,三人三書都有強烈的批判性,其中尤以姚際恆《詩經通論》為最。姚際恆對於歷代的解《詩》成果都不滿意,愈是權威性的、典範性的著作,愈容易成為姚氏的批評對象,於是,完成於漢代的《毛詩》學派解詩系統-《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》成為姚氏首要推翻的《詩》學文本。本文分析姚際恆《詩經通論》的《詩》教觀及其反漢學色彩,歸結出姚氏批評《詩序》、《毛傳》、鄭《箋》的內容,也針對這些內容進行評論,最後並指出姚書解釋意涵中的漢學風味,以突顯出該書的一大特色。 |
英文摘要 | Yao Ji-Heng and Cui-Su, Fang Yu-run were called the three masters of Shijing in Qing Dynasty. They had the most independent spirit in their research .They had a strong critical character in their books, Yao Ji-Heng Shi Jing Tong Lun especially. The more authoritative and paradigmatic those works are, the more easily they tend to be the object of Yao Ji-Heng's criticism. In this particular interpretation of the viewpoint, the Han Dynasty, Mao School representatives-Shi Xu, Mao Chuan, Zheng Jian, as the target that Yao Ji-Heng wanted to overthrow. In this thesis, we analyzed the view of moral education of Shi Jing and the anti-Han school feature of Yao Ji-Heng, generalized and remarked the work of Yao's criticizing Shi-Xu, Mao-Chuan, Zheng-Jian. In the end we pointed out the Han school savor of the intention in Yao's explanation, in order to highlight the clearest character of Yao's book. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。