查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Socially Supportive Activity Inventory: Reliability and Validity of a Social Activity Instrument for Long-Term Care Institutions
- 臺灣功能障礙老人家庭照護者的全國概況剖析
- 老人長期照護中家庭功能之初探
- 社區老人照護--談長期照護機構設置
- 省立中興醫院/社區化整體性--老人長期照護服務
- 老人長期照護政策評估
- 分割老人V.S.整合照護--談長期照護機構一元化
- The Predictors of Long-Term Care Service Utilization among Older Americans
- 我國老人長期照護政策措施的檢討與建議
- 無約束的長期照護機構
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Socially Supportive Activity Inventory: Reliability and Validity of a Social Activity Instrument for Long-Term Care Institutions=長期照護機構之社會支持型活動量表信度與效度之建構 |
---|---|
作 者 | 許雅娟; | 書刊名 | The Journal of Nursing Research |
卷 期 | 19:3 2011.09[民100.09] |
頁 次 | 頁161-172 |
分類號 | 419.71 |
關鍵詞 | 老人; 社會活動; 長期照護; 信效度; Elders; Social activity; Long-term care; Reliability and validity; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 背景 : 在長期照護機構中,為使住民在機構化的生活中增添生活樂趣,進而提升住民身心健康,安排豐富又多元的活動是常見的方式;但活動情形之評估,尚缺乏具信效度之本土性量表。 目的 : 為建構一份具文化敏感度之「社會支持型活動量表」及其信效度,以期日後能對長期照護機構評量住民參與社會活動的量與質有所助益。 方法 : 此量表奠基於社會支持理論,在整合社會活動相關文獻與結合台灣文化背景下所發展。量表以專家效度與再測信度來檢驗,經由方便取樣方式,以台灣南部一所提供常規、多樣化活動之長期照護機構之10位非失智老年住民為對象進行前驅研究。 結果 : 研究結果顯示,專家內容效度指標(content validity index, CVI)達.96。信度方面,本量表間隔兩週再測信度(test-retest reliability)係數分別為:整體量表.76-1.00;活動之頻率1.00;活動之意義性 .76-1.00;活動之享樂性 .78-1.00,顯示所有題目皆達顯著穩定性。 結論 : 結果顯示,「社會支持型活動量表」無論是效度或信度上,可為長期照護機構在評估其住民參與社會活動之質與量的可靠及可信工具。由於此為前驅性研究,建議未來能夠增加長期照護機構研究地點、樣本數,以及利用不同方法比較、測量社會活動,以建立更完善、嚴謹之心理計量特質。 |
英文摘要 | Background: Diverse social and recreational activities in elder care institutions have been provided to enrich a person’s mental well-being amidst what is a relatively monotonous life. However, few instruments that measure the social activities of long-term care residents are available. Purpose: This study was designed to develop a culturally sensitive instrument (Socially Supportive Activity Inventory, SSAI) to assess quantity and quality of social activities for long-term care institutions and validate the instrument’s psychometric properties. Methods: The SSAI was developed on the basis of the social support theory, a synthesis of literature, and Taiwanese cultural mores. The instrument was rigorously subjected to a two-stage process to evaluate its reliability and validity. In Stage 1, six experts from diverse backgrounds were recruited to evaluate instrument items and estimate the content validity of the instrument using a content validity questionnaire. Items were modified and refined on the basis of the responses of the expert panel and a set of criteria. After obtaining approval from a university institutional review board, in the second stage of evaluating testYretest reliability, a convenience sample of 10 Taiwanese institutionalized elders in a pilot study, recruited from a nursing home, completed the revised instrument at two separate times over 2 weeks. Results: Results showed a content validity of .96. TestYretest reliability from a sample of 10 participants yielded stability coefficients of .76Y1.00. The stability coefficient was 1.00 for the component of frequency, .76Y1.00 for the component of meaningfulness, and .78Y1.00 for the component of enjoyment. Conclusion: The SSAI is a highly relevant and reliable culturally based instrument that can measure social activity in long-term care facilities. Because of the pilot nature of this study, future directions include further exploration of the SSAI instrument’s psychometric properties. This should be done by enlarging the sample size to include more long-term care facilities and individual participants. Future studies can utilize diverse measures of social activity for comparison and validation of the SSAI. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。