查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《禮記.禮器》「經禮三百,曲禮三千」注釋異說及其影響探究=On the Different Interpretations of "Jingli Sanbai, Quli Sanqian" in Classic of Rites and Their Effects |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭雯馨; | 書刊名 | 臺大中文學報 |
卷期 | 33 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁139-183 |
分類號 | 094.3 |
關鍵詞 | 經禮; 曲禮; 鄭玄; 朱子; Jingli; Quli; Zheng Xuan; Zhu Xi; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「經禮三百,曲禮三千」向爲學者闡述禮學結構、體系的依據,歷來對此句的詮釋亦十分豐富。本文嘗試以引領學界的鄭玄與朱子學說作爲切入點,依次辨析與檢討鄭玄「經禮爲《周禮》,曲禮爲《儀禮》」、朱熹「經禮爲成套之儀式,曲禮爲細小儀節」二種說法,並指出其影響。然後,基於《儀禮》作者、成書年代的不同認知,筆者根據「經禮三百,曲禮三千」的原文脈絡,並省視相關說法,考察「經禮三百,曲禮三千」的含義。最後,則說明〈禮器〉原文與注釋異說所具有的重要性。 |
英文摘要 | Scholars often explain and construct the theory of Chinese etiquette with the phrase ”Jingli sanbai quli sanqian”, which has many interpretations. This paper first focuses on two authoritative interpretations, one given by Zheng Xuan and the other by Zhu Xi, in attempt to explain respectively their differences and effects. When solving the problems of the two statements about the real author and publication year, this paper explores the meaning of this phrase through an analysis of the phrase's context and other related exegetic materials. The importance of the phrase in Classic of Rites and their different exegeses is discussed in the end. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。