查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Constituency of Classifier Constructions in Mandarin Chinese
- Rules vs. Analogy in Mandarin Classifier Selection
- 量詞的探研
- Chinese Classifier Tiao Revisited: A Cognitive Linguistics Study
- 談新時期漢語量詞運用的新變化
- 漢語詞彙教學研究--量詞篇
- Nouns or Classifiers: A Non-Movement Analysis of Classifiers in Chinese
- Bibliography on Chinese Classifiers and Measure Words
- 漢語方言的名量詞
- 數量詞話題導入功能的適用名詞範圍
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | The Constituency of Classifier Constructions in Mandarin Chinese=漢語單位詞結構的句法成分分析 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 張寧; | 書刊名 | Taiwan Journal of Linguistics |
| 卷 期 | 9:1 2011.06[民100.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-49 |
| 分類號 | 802.6 |
| 關鍵詞 | 單位詞; 量詞; 句法成分; 左分枝; 右分枝; 漢語; Classifier; Measure; Constituent; Left-branching; Right-branching; Chinese; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 中文摘要 | 由數詞,單位詞,及名詞構成的短語可分析為三種句法結構:容器單位詞,度量單位詞,部分單位詞及群體單位詞出現在左分枝結構中,個體單位詞及個體化單位詞出現在右分枝結構中,種類單位詞出現在延伸式右分枝結構中。此結論由以下考慮得出:左邊緣修飾語的轄域;單位詞的修飾語與名詞的修飾語之間的依存關係;數詞與單位詞的合成體之可能的句法功能;以及單位詞對名詞的語意選擇。本文指出數詞與單位詞的共現以及“多”及“半”的位置都無法證明數詞與單位詞是否構成一個句法成分。而且左右分枝與數量語義及個體語義無對應關係。此外,本文認為單位詞後帶“的”的結構有可能是比較句的省略句式,所以“的”的位置並不一定標示句法成分的分界處。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper examines the constituency of the construction that contains three elements: a numeral, a word that encodes a counting unit, such as a classifier or measure word, and a noun in Mandarin Chinese. It identifies three structures: a left-branching structure for container measures, standard measures, partitive classifiers, and collective classifiers; a right-branching structure for individual and individuating classifiers; and a structure in which no two of the three elements form a constituent, for kind classifiers. The identification is based on the investigation of four issues: <i> the scope of a left-peripheral modifier; <ii> the dependency between the modifier of unit word and that of a noun; <iii> the complement and predicate status of the combination of a numeral and a unit word; <iv> the semantic selection relation between a unit word and a noun. The paper also shows that the co-occurrence of a numeral and a unit word and the position of certain partitive markers are not reliable in identifying syntactic constituents. It also argues against quantity-individual semantic mappings with different syntactic structures. Finally, the paper presents a comparative deletion analysis of the constructions in which the functional word de follows a unit word. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。