查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 兩岸專利侵權分析原則比較=A Comparison of Principles for Patent Infringement Analysis in Taiwan and China |
---|---|
作 者 | 孫寶成; | 書刊名 | 智慧財產權月刊 |
卷 期 | 152 2011.08[民100.08] |
頁 次 | 頁55-80 |
分類號 | 440.6 |
關鍵詞 | 專利侵害鑑定要點; 司法解釋; 文義讀取; 均等論; 禁反言; Patent infringement assessment guidelines; Judicial interpretations; Literally read-on; Doctrine of equivalents; Doctrine of estoppel; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 摘要 兩岸專利侵權分析原則的依據分別為我國專利侵害鑑定要點以及大 陸最高法院所作出的的專利司法解釋。我國專利侵害鑑定要點下篇「專利 侵害之鑑定原則」中的幾個重要項目涵括:「解釋申請專利範圍」、「全要 件原則」、「文義讀取」、「均等論」、「禁反言」、「先前技術阻卻」以及「逆 均等論」,其中除了「逆均等論」以外,大陸的專利司法解釋均有對應的 規定。兩岸專利侵權分析原則在大方向上大致一致,但在細節部分仍存在 一些差異。 |
英文摘要 | Abstract In Taiwan and China, the grounds for patent infringement analysis are the Patent Infringement Assessment Guidelines and the Patent Judicial Interpretations announced by the R.O.C. (Taiwan) Intellectual Property Office and the China People's Supreme Court respectively. The main items covered by volume II of the Guidelines include: "claim interpretation", "all-element rules", "literally read-on", "doctrine of equivalents", "doctrine of estoppels", "practicing the prior art defense" and "reverse doctrine of equivalents". TheJudicial Interpretations also cover these items except for the reverse doctrine of equivalents. The content of the items in the Guidelines and the Judicial Interpretations are, generally speaking, similar but different in some details. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。