查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 由比較法觀點論金融機構之適當性義務
- 衍生性金融商品之內線交易禁止法律規制:以規範客體範圍與民事賠償責任為核心
- 以適合性原則與說明義務為中心談金融消費者之保護--從最高法院連動債判決談起
- 說明義務在金融商品交易之理論與實務上之運用--對連動債紛爭之省思--民法研討會第五十七次研討會會議紀錄
- 連動債糾紛的司法實踐--2009至2010年間相關判決之研究
- 客戶決定購買高於其風險屬性之金融商品時,銷售機構應否戒絕交易?/臺北地院98金簡上5[裁判簡評]
- 金融商品交易上關於說明義務之理論與實務上之運用--對連動債紛爭之省思
- 論結構債之法律關係及指定用途金錢信託之法律性質
- 從TRF風暴省思臺灣金融消費者保護
- 論機器人投資顧問之興起與投資人之保護--以美國法為中心
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 由比較法觀點論金融機構之適當性義務=Construction of Suitability Obligation of Financial Institutions When Selling Structured Products: From Comparative Law Perspective |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳肇鴻; | 書刊名 | 軍法專刊 |
卷 期 | 57:2 2011.04[民100.04] |
頁 次 | 頁75-98 |
分類號 | 561.2 |
關鍵詞 | 推介適當性; 妥適性; 適合性; 行為規範; 比較法; 投資顧問; 連動債; 結構債; 衍生性金融商品; 結構型產品; Suitability; Appropriateness; Conduct of business; Comparative law; Investment advice; Structured notes; Derivatives; Structured products; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文之主要目的,在經由比較法的研究,來檢討我國法下金融機構銷售結構型商品 之適當性義務之規定以及若干問題。於金融海嘯之後,主管機關有透過行政命令課以金 融機構若干程度之適當性義務,然而,由比較法的立場,我國之現行規範之適用範圍相 當狹礙,且就用適用之法律關係上未更細緻地區別不同的法律關係,同時,現行規範亦 未更明確界定適當性之標準。本文以為,可由風險的分類的角度出發更進一步細緻化產 品適當性的問題,就結構型商品,並應同時建立更專業完整之合約審閱之機制,以明確 化適當性的標準以供金融機構遵循,以利能更有效達成適當性義務之目的,並建構更完 整且有效率之投資人保護機制。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this article is to examine the suitability rules regarding structured products under Taiwan law from a comparative law perspective. After the global financial crisis, Taiwan has imposed specific suitability obligations on financial institutions when they promote derivatives and structured products. However, the suitability rule is only placed in administrative regulations and its scope is also limited. In addition, Taiwan law does not distinguish different types of relationships between a financial institution and a client. Furthermore, the biggest challenge to the suitability rule is to define the meaning of 'suitable'. This article argues that the starting point is the analysis of risks uitability. However, the analysis of return aspect should not be ignored. As to product due diligence, regulators must further venture into the review of documentation and offer more detailed guidelines to financial institutions in order to serve the purpose of the suitability rule and create an efficient mechanism for investor protection. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。