查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 高美野生動物保護區之經營管理效能評估=Evaluation of Management Effectiveness of Gaomei Wildlife Refuge |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 趙芝良; 葉美智; 盧道杰; 陳瑋苓; 徐霈馨; | 書刊名 | 國家公園學報 |
卷期 | 20:4 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁33-44 |
分類號 | 992.38 |
關鍵詞 | 溼地; 權益關係人; 經營管理循環; 威脅與壓力; 基地尺度; Wetlands; Stakeholders; Management cycle; Threat and pressure; Site-level; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究應用世界自然基金會(WWF)的保護區經營管理快速評估與設定優 先法(The Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Areas Management, RAPPAM),並結合訪談、焦點團體與文獻回顧等方法,對高美野生動物保護區, 進行保護區經營管理效能評估。共獲得三項研究成果,於第一次工作坊中,由權益 關係人共同討論出此區的壓力與威脅共有溼地陸化、垃圾污染、水污染、外來種入 侵、遊憩壓力、開發壓力、保護區與地方民意互動不足、長期監測資料不足、經營 管理規劃不足、經費不足與人力不足等壓力與威脅項目。在第二次工作坊中,權益 人依據經營管理效能循環架構,評估結果以「基礎設施」與「溝通與資訊」等為投 入(inputs)主題之相對優勢類別;而規劃(planning) 主題中的「位置的設計與規劃」 以及過程(process )中的「經營管理計畫」則為相對弱勢類別。此外,本研究並透過 統計分析,檢定權益關係人在經營管理循環元素間的脈絡關係。最後,依據上述結 果,提出實質環境面與經營管理面的缺失與因應,以回應本保護區在基地管理上的 需求。 |
英文摘要 | As parks and protected areas have been installed worldwide to counteract increasing biodiversity decline, many parks still lack a simple yet effective tool to assess and contain human impact in these establishments. This paper reports on an application of WWF Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) methodology to assess management effectiveness of Gaomei Wetlands Wildlife Refuge, a protected area established by Taichung County Government, Taiwan, in September, 2004. A four-stage management effectiveness evaluation process is applied, and three results are discussed. First, nine pressures and threats are identified, and 10 items for specific management improvement are suggested in the first participatory workshop. Second, in order to examine management effectiveness, all stakeholders are required to rate performances in a four-level ordinal scale through 14 criteria from five elements of IUCN-WCPA framework. Evaluation result shows the element of “inputs” had the highest score, especially in the criteria of “infrastructure”and “communication and information inputs.” The lowest performance is explored in elements “planning” and “process”; while the weaknesses criteria include “site design and planning” and “management planning.” Finally, quantitative analyses are used to test inter-rater reliability among stakeholders and to explain the relationships among the elements of management cycle. Discussion and suggestion based on the results are also mentioned in this paper. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。