查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從美國醫療失當改革立法談臺灣規範之趨勢=The Trend of Medical Malpractice Law Reform--Based on the Experience of U.S.A |
---|---|
作 者 | 邱玟惠; | 書刊名 | 法學新論 |
卷 期 | 28 2011.02[民100.02] |
頁 次 | 頁75-98 |
分類號 | 412.21 |
關鍵詞 | 訴訟; 調解; 仲裁; 損害賠償; 除罪化; 醫療失當; 醫療失當改革立法; 醫療糾紛; Medical malpractice; Medical malpractice reform legislation; Medical dispute; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣醫療糾紛之處理現況中,最令醫師頭疼的是病方「以刑逼民」的訴訟手段,而病方則是普遍不信任司法公正性,就此社會現象之導正,現有的相關規範與運作機制可謂是一籌莫展。本文由美國醫療失當改革立法切入,觀察彼國為因應當代醫療失當訴訟之各項改革方案以為借鏡。其中,對於須以專家證言作為判斷之案件,採「有勝訴可能的具結狀」與「醫療訴訟審查庭」之設計概念,或許可為臺灣目前醫療糾紛處理困境之解決,提供新的思考方向。 |
英文摘要 | In order to deal with a crisis in the delivery of medical care associated with prohibitive costs in connection with medical malpractice insurance, various forms of medical malpractice reform legislation in U.S.A. has been enacted since 1975 and caused a dramatic change in the handling of medical malpractice cases for plaintiffs. Despite the never ended disputes, such reform approaches did achieve some success in reducing the medical malpractice insurance costs. Among them, more than half the jurisdictions in U.S.A. have enacted some statutes requiring “medical review panel” or “affidavit of merit” by compelling plaintiffs to retain an expert medical witness at the commencement of their representation as a condition precedent to the filing or trial of a malpractice case, which might be inspiring and promising if was introduced into our medical malpractice jurisdiction to cut-off apparently improper medical malpractice litigations. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。