查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Analyzing Complete Approval Voting Data under Thurstonian Framework
- Measuring the Economic Benefits from Recreation by Using the Mixed Logit Model
- 應用非線性隨機效用模型探討臺灣森林資源的遊憩價值
- When Households of Risk-Aversion Face Increased Flood Risks from Climate Change
- Assessing the Benefits of Risk Alleviation: The Dynamic Analysis of Random Utility Model
- 臺灣東部賞鯨旅遊之登船港口遊憩效益評估
- 運用巢式羅吉特模型探討老人住宅選擇之研究
- 選項集合在隨機效用模型應用之關鍵性--以沿海溼地遊憩價值之評估為例
- 臺灣選民的真誠投票之推估:模型建構與實證分析
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Analyzing Complete Approval Voting Data under Thurstonian Framework=賽斯通架構下完整核准式選擇資料之分析 |
---|---|
作 者 | 蔡蓉青; | 書刊名 | 中華心理學刊 |
卷期 | 52:2 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁次 | 頁205-219 |
分類號 | 171.457 |
關鍵詞 | 核准式選擇; 隨機效用模型; Approval voting; Random utility model; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 核准式選擇是一種常用的票選型態。在核准式選擇的票選型態中,選民要從選項中挑選出他(她)所核准的部分選項。例如在聘任委員會於面談後要決定是否錄用應徵者時,在第一階段很常見的作法就是使用核准其資格的核准式選擇。過去在面對核准式選擇這類的社會決策資料時,「全選」和「全不選」兩種選擇反應大都因為不影響票選結果,在資料分析時常常是將其摒除於分析或模型之外。然而「全選」和「全不選」兩種選擇其實是很普遍且常常被收集或觀察到的選擇反應,所以在了解核准式選擇行為背後的機制時,實有將其涵蓋在內的必要。在此論文中,我們嘗試延伸目前利用效用模型的架構來調查核准式選擇行為背後機制的作法,特別將「全選」和「全不選」兩種選擇反應也考慮進去,以期能更完整地了解選擇行為背後的機制以及票選行為之中的個別差異。最後會利用兩個實際應用的例子來說明提出的效用模型之用途及評估它在描述決策機制上的表現。 |
英文摘要 | The method of approval voting is a commonly used voting procedure. In an approval voting task, each judge is usually asked to select a subset of the alternatives. For example, it is a common practice that the recruiting committee, after interviewing a set of job applicants, may apply approval voting to determine the qualification of the candidates at the first run of the hiring process. In analyzing social choices such as elections, the "none" and "all" responses are often discarded since they do not affect on the overall decision or conclusion. However, in understanding and modeling the approval voting mechanism or heuristics, it becomes preferable to include these two responses in the analysis as well. In this paper, we extend the current random utility approach to allow for the modeling of "none" and "all" responses and therefore provide a more complete account of the approval voting mechanism in the underlying choice process as well as the individual difference in their judgment. Empirical examples are given to illustrate the usefulness of our approval voting model formulation. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。