查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 夫妻間之贈與及自由處分金於法定財產制下剩餘財產分配之處理--我國民法第一○三○條之一第一項及第一○一八條之一與德國、瑞士民法相關規範之比較研究
- 從男女平等觀點論民法第1018條之1自由處分金之解釋
- 論民國九十一年法定財產制修正後剩餘財產分配之請求權
- 論我國通常法定夫妻財產制--聯合財產制 (身分法研究會第三次研討會記錄)
- 剩餘財產分配請求權與非常法定財產制之關係
- 我國民法與英國婚姻訴訟法之比較--以夫妻財產分配和家務勞動評價為中心
- 夫妻間之債權債務與剩餘財產分配請求權--臺灣高等法院暨所屬法院104年法律座談會民事類提案第16號評析
- 臺灣法定財產制之變遷與發展
- 論法定財產制中剩餘財產分配數額之調整:我國民法第1030條之1第2項之調整規範,與瑞士、德國民法相關規範之比較研究
- 勞動能力減喪損害賠償作為剩餘財產分配
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 夫妻間之贈與及自由處分金於法定財產制下剩餘財產分配之處理--我國民法第一○三○條之一第一項及第一○一八條之一與德國、瑞士民法相關規範之比較研究=The Effect of Donations between Spouses and the Effect of Payment of Money for Free Disposal by the Distribution of Surplus of Matrimonial Assets under the Statutory Matrimonial Property Regime--A Comparative Study of Art. 1030 a Paragraph 1 and Art. 1018 a of the Civil Code of Taiwan with the Relevant Provisions in the German BGB and the Swiss ZGB |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林易典; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷期 | 118 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-104 |
分類號 | 584.413 |
關鍵詞 | 法定財產制; 民法第一○三○條之一; 剩餘財產分配; 無償取得; 夫妻間贈與; 自由處分金; 剩餘財產分配預付; 民法第一○一八條之一; Statutory matrimonial property regime; Art. 1030 a of the Civil Code; Distribution of surplus of matrimonial assets; Gratuitous acquisition; Donation between spouses; Money for free disposal; Prepayment of distribution of surplus of matrimonial assets; Art. 1018 a of the Civil Code; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國民法法定財產制之規範於一九八五年修正時,導入第一○三○條之一夫妻之剩餘財產分配請求權規範,並經二○○二年、二○○七年之修正。本文首先分析比較德國民法第一三八○條及瑞士民法第一六四條之規範與實務。其次並分析我國民法第一○三○條之一第一項但書第一款之適用原則及相關實務。於剩餘財產分配規範下,依第一○三○條之一第一項但書第一款之規定,「無償取得」之財產被排除於分配標的之範圍外。如夫妻一方於婚後自他方收受贈與物,因贈與本屬無償行為,因之所取得之財產仍構成此一「無償取得」,而無庸提供分配。不應因受贈人曾有婚姻共同生活犧牲及貢獻,及贈與人具有配偶之身分,贈與之取得即被視為家務貢獻之代價而為有償,而須提供分配。此外,依二○○二年增訂之第一○一八條之一「自由處分金」條款,夫妻間得協議支付一定數額之金錢,供他方自由處分。如將「自由處分金」之支付或受領解釋為剩餘財產分配之預付或預先受領,此過度擬制夫妻當事人之意思,且實際上創造出新的剩餘財產分配方式之效果,有違現行第一○三○條之一第一項法律所允許之分配方式。如夫妻間之自由處分金協議中,並無對待給付或對價關係之契約約定時,其無償性仍應被肯認,使受領之一方於法定財產制關係消滅時無庸提供分配,不僅能自由處分,亦能終局保有,並而能符合當事人間自由處分金給付時,無另外透過剩餘財產交互參與分配過程,取回其剩餘之半數的本意。 |
英文摘要 | In 1985 the equalization claim of the spouse for surplus of matrimonial assets, Art. 1030 a, was introduced into the statutory matrimonial property regime of Taiwan. This provision was modified in 2002 and 2007. This article is a comparative study of the provisions of § 1380 of the German Civil Code (BGB) and Art. 164 of the Swiss Civil Code (ZGB) and analysis of their practices. Besides, this article analyses the principles to apply Art. 1030 a paragraph 1 No.1 of the Civil Code of Taiwan and its practices. The "gratuitously acquired" assets are excluded from the scope of the object of distribution according to the provision of distribution of surplus of matrimonial assets, i.e., Art. 1030 a, paragraph 1, No. 1. If one party of the spouses accepted a donated object from the other party of the spouses, this shall still constitute the above-mentioned "gratuitous acquired" asset and does not have to be provided for distribution. The acquired asset, owing to donation from the other party of the spouses, should not be regarded as the price of contribution. It should not constitute "paid acquired" and does not need to be provided for distribution, even though the donee has sacrificed for and contributed to the common family life and the donor has a status of spouse. According to Art. 1018 a, amended in 2002, the spouses may also reach an agreement such that one spouse pays a designated amount of money to another spouse for his/her free disposal. If the transaction of money for free disposal is interpreted as the prepayment of distribution of surplus of matrimonial assets, this excessively constitutes the will of the spouses and actually leads to the creation of a new model of distribution of matrimonial assets which under Art. 1030 a, paragraph 1 will not be permitted. If the agreement of money for free disposal does not contain the obligation of counter-performance or the relationship as a counter-performance, the gratuitous character of acquisition of money for free disposal should be recognized. This enables the acquired party not to have to provide acquisition for distribution while the statutory matrimonial property regime perishes. He/She can therefore be finally free to both dispose and preserve. The true will of the spouse who made payment of money for free disposal can also be met, because he/she does not intend to claim back half of the amount of surplus of this payment by way of process of cross distribution of matrimonial assets. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。