頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究:以禁制、遷出及遠離令為例=Study on the Effectiveness of Protection Orders of Intimate Partner Violence Incidents |
---|---|
作 者 | 王珮玲; | 書刊名 | 社會政策與社會工作學刊 |
卷 期 | 14:2 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁 次 | 頁1-47 |
分類號 | 544.18 |
關鍵詞 | 親密伴侶暴力; 保護令; 保護令成效; 脅迫控制; 跟蹤; Intimate partner violence; Protection order; Effectiveness of protection order; Coercive control; Stalking; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 民事保護令是我國家庭暴力防治法中最重要的保護措施之一,本研究旨在探討親密伴侶暴力案件禁制令、遷出令及遠離令等保護令之成效,以女性被害人、男性施暴者案件爲研究對象,透過對擁有保護令之婦女(n=203),進行二次的追蹤調查,探討擁有保護令婦女的受暴狀況、民事保護令核發後施暴者再施暴與違反保護令之情形、以及影響保護令成效之相關因素。研究發現,擁有保護令的婦女普遍遭受到施暴者嚴重的暴力對待,暴力型態包括肢體暴力、性暴力、脅迫控制、性暴力、跟蹤及精神傷害等,受暴時間平均超過六年。對於禁制令、遷出令及遠離令之效果,於核發保護令第三、九個月後之二次對被害人的追蹤調查後顯示,施暴者整體違反保護令之比率約四成,而再發生肢體暴力之比率則約19%。有關違反保護令之相關因素,發現施暴者具有犯罪前科、有精神疾病,施暴者對被害人有脅迫控制及跟蹤等行爲時,施暴者違反保護令及再度發生肢體暴力之可能性均顯著較高;另保護令核發之內容是否符合被害人之需求及警察是否落實執行,與施暴者是否遵守保護令亦有顯著相關。最後本文亦針對研究結果加以討論,並對實務工作之意涵提出建議。 |
英文摘要 | Protection order is one of the most important safety strategies on the Domestic Violence Prevention Act in Taiwan. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of protection orders which related to safety directly, including forbidden to engage in family violence, to threat victim, and to engage in harassment, or other unnecessary acts of contact with the victim, order to leave the residence of the victim, and order to stay away from the victim's location . By interviewing female victims of intimate partner violence after receiving protection orders 3 and 9 months, this study wanted to understand battered women's victimization experience, the violation situation of offenders, and factors related to the effectiveness of protection orders. The findings indicated that the battered women with protection orders experiencing severe physical violence, sexual violence, coercive control and stalking from their intimate partners. The average victimization of battered women with protection order lasted over six years. The protection orders are violated of 40%, and the women re-abused are about 19%. The offenders who have a history of violent crime, mental disorders, coercive controlling and stalking behaviors are more often than others to violate protection orders. In addition, when the contents of protection orders are more conforming to victims' needs, and police cnforcing orders fully, the offenders are less likely to violate protection orders. Finally, policy implications and suggestions have been discussed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。