查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 臨床因素的消失:臺灣剖腹產研究的知識生產政治
- 產科照護之再省思--由減少剖腹產談起
- Severe Delayed Postpartum Hemorrhage Following Cesarean Section
- Pregnancy in a Previous Cesarean Section Scar: Case Report
- Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Isobaric Versus Hyperbaric Solution
- 一位經歷新生兒性別期待失落之剖腹產經產婦照護經驗
- Views of Obstetric Patients Who Refuse Regional Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
- 剖腹產對產婦的意義
- 一位產婦選擇剖腹產後自然生產的經驗過程
- 剖腹產不同麻醉方式對新生兒之影響Epidural與Ketamine麻醉之比較
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臨床因素的消失:臺灣剖腹產研究的知識生產政治=The Disappearance of Clinical Factors: Knowledge Production Politics of Cesarean-Section Research in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 吳嘉苓; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會學刊 |
卷期 | 45 2010.12[民99.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-62 |
分類號 | 417.37 |
關鍵詞 | 知識生產; 科技與社會研究; 臨床因素; 剖腹產; Knowledge production; STS; Clinical factors; Cesarean section; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以過去50年來台灣剖腹產成因的學術研究作爲分析對象,試圖描述其知識變遷特性,解釋其爲何轉變,並分析其後果。主要資料爲102篇相關研究論文的內容分析,並輔以檔案資料、國際文獻、深入訪談與參與觀察。本文提出「醫師不再研究臨床因素」,作爲台灣剖腹產研究的重大轉變。自1960年代開始,產科醫師以醫院病歷進行調查,在自己的社群進行發表與討論,以胎位不正、前胎剖腹等臨床因素,作爲分析重點,並針對產科的技術面提出改進方案。1990年代開始,剖腹產擴大爲公共爭議,在知識位階與研究標準的改變下,產科醫師不再從事相關研究。公衛、醫管與健康經濟學家轉而以健保資料庫作爲主要分析對象,並著重以婦女行爲與制度因素作爲主要解釋模型,臨床因素僅爲控制變項,並且受到黑盒子化。研究成果的政策意涵也轉爲強調檢討健保制度、機構因素以及民眾行爲。本文主張打破產科知識作爲鐵板一塊的分析模式,看重產科研究對於生產改革的潛在貢獻。本文建議改造知識生產結構,將臨床因素重新納入台灣高剖腹產率的研究重點。才更可能爲台灣10多年來高居不下的剖腹產率,建立更清楚的解釋圖像,鋪陳對焦的改革藍圖。 |
英文摘要 | In this paper I investigate the transformation of knowledge production in researching high cesarean section (CS) rates in Taiwan over the past fifty years. I use the perspectives of science, technology and society studies (STS), and medical sociology to analyze how the social structure of scientific communities and changes in data collection, research tools, research conceptualization, and research modeling have led to this transformation. The primary data include 102 research articles, book chapters, master theses, and reports on high CS rates in Taiwan, plus interviews with 21 researchers and obstetricians. Starting in the 1960s, obstetricians used hospital medical records to document increasing CS rates in specific hospitals, and published their findings in local academic journals. They focused on clinical factors such as breech presentation and previous C-sections, and suggested improvements in obstetric techniques to avoid unnecessary C-sections. In the 1990s, Taiwan's high CS rate became a widely reported and discussed issue, and obstetricians faced pressure from their peers. In addition, laboratory research started to receive greater academic prestige than studying epidemiological data; therefore CS research by obstetricians came to an almost complete halt. Such studies were replaced by research from the fields of public health, medical administration, and health economics. These efforts relied mainly on National Health Insurance database to study CS trends in Taiwan. Their studies, which treated clinical factors as controlling variables, focused on institutional factors and birth women’s behaviors to construct explanatory models. Here I argue in support of the potential contribution of studies by obstetricians to childbirth reform, and suggest strategies to bring clinical factors back into research efforts on high CS rates in Taiwan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。