查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 公眾記憶與口述傳統--再論《歷史》的真實性問題
- 大溪地華人的歷史敘事與「國家」認同
- 口述歷史理論與實務初探--以臨溪社區錄音訪談為例
- The Infinite Regression in Sartre's Nausea
- 波動率模型預測能力的比較--以臺指選擇權為例
- 從斷裂到再連結:論佟妮.莫莉森「爵士樂」中的遷徙、記憶與文化議題
- 宮花寂寞紅:歷史宮闈片的真實性與戲劇性
- 重建觀念史圖像中的歷史真實--中國近代觀念史研究的新範式
- 當神話變成了歷史--1990年代臺灣原住民族歷史建構與文化政治
- Implementing History and Memory in an Advanced Content--Based Chinese Class: What, How and Why in "Chinese History through Cinema and Cross-talk"
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 公眾記憶與口述傳統--再論《歷史》的真實性問題=Public Memories and Oral Tradition : The Authenticity of Herodotus' Histories Once Again |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳曉群; | 書刊名 | 新史學 |
卷 期 | 21:2 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁 次 | 頁165-219 |
分類號 | 601.6 |
關鍵詞 | 希羅多德; 歷史; 真實; 公眾記憶; 口述傳統; Herodotus; History; Authenticity; Public memories; Oral tradition; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 儘管希羅多德在西方被譽為「歷史學之父」,但他所著的《歷史》中所記載史實的「真實性」卻倍受後世質疑:希羅多德的敘述多以口述資料為主,由於口述資料來自於記憶,如何判斷記憶的真實性便成了一個問題。然而,正是公眾記憶與口述傳統,構成了我們理解希羅多德《歷史》真實性的關鍵所在。在古代希臘,所謂「真實」,並非簡單地表現為一種經驗上的真實,而更多體現為具有某種普遍性的集體記憶,是一種「記憶的真實」。它也許缺乏發生事件的準確信息,但它表達了曾經經驗到卻未在經驗記載中表達出的情感因素。它不僅反映了過去所發生的事情,而且反映了當時的人們是如何思考、看待那些事情。特別是在一切「最重要的活動都被賦予了完全的公開性」的城邦語境下,那些口述的材料經過公眾集體記憶的檢驗,在很大程度上是能夠還原歷史的面目。由於古人對於應該保有怎樣的集體記憶以及記憶的形式和它所承載的意義的理解與今人有所不同,所以我們就不能簡單地從某種現代的「歷史」觀念出發,來判定《歷史》所敘述的真實性。因此,只有愈加深入地了解古典史家生活的社會環境及其時代精神,了解他們的局限性、他們的期望和古代讀者與聽眾的期望,才能夠更好地解讀他們的著作、理解古人的「生活世界」。 |
英文摘要 | Although Herodotus is honored in the western world as the "father of history", the authenticity of facts underlining his work, the Histories, has been questioned. Because the discussion of the authenticity of the Histories is based mainly on these based facts that derive from oral material on memory, the question arises of how to judge the authenticity of such memories. This paper makes the point that public memories and oral tradition are creaticed in helping us understand the authenticity of the Histories. In ancient Greece, so-called "authentic versions" were preserved and transmitted in certain collective memories, 'authenticity' was thus not a matter of simple empirical facts. Although it may lack some of the precise detail on historical events, oral history retains the emotional elements of history. It reflects not only what was happening in the past, but what people thought of these. Particularly in the context of the ancient Greek polis, where important activities were fully open to the public view, oral material that had been tested by public memory could provide an authentic record of history. We should not determine the credibility of the Histories only according to our modern concept of “history”: rather, we should bear in mind the form and meaning of such public memories as well. The author therefore points out that only by knowing more about the social environment in which the classical historians were living, by grasping the spirit of ancient times, and by fully understanding the classical historians' limitations, as well as their and their readers' (or audiences') expectations, can we read and interpret ancient historical works to improve our understanding of the ancient "real world" in ancient times. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。