查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- High-dose Bisacodyl Plus Water Lavage Compared With Oral Sodium Phosphate as Bowel Preparation for Outpatient Colonoscopy
- 重碳酸氫鈉、檸檬酸鈉、磷酸鈉鹽類對運動的效益
- Management of Iatrogenic Colonoscopic Perforation
- Colonoscopy--A Review of Personal Experience of 1500 Cases in Eight Years
- Invaginated Appendiceal Stump Mimicking A Cecal Tumor
- 在施行痔切除手術同時接受大腸鏡檢查的可行性評估
- 應用條碼科技於大腸鏡檢查受檢者辨識正確性之改善專案
- 高品質大腸鏡檢查指引
- 高品質大腸鏡檢查指引
- 大腸憩室症
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | High-dose Bisacodyl Plus Water Lavage Compared With Oral Sodium Phosphate as Bowel Preparation for Outpatient Colonoscopy=大腸鏡檢查前準備方法 : 高劑量Bisacodyl合併飲水清腸與口服磷酸鈉鹽之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳泰安; 翁欣蓉; 林俊谷; 余憲忠; 許秉毅; 羅錦河; 黎國洪; | 書刊名 | Journal of the Chinese Medical Association |
卷 期 | 72:8 2009.08[民98.08] |
頁 次 | 頁402-407+CA75 |
分類號 | 416.245 |
關鍵詞 | 清腸方式; 大腸鏡檢查; 磷酸鈉鹽; Bisacodyl; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Sodium phosphate; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | BACKGROOUND : The aim of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy and patient compliance of an oral high dose of bisacodyl plus water lavage and oral sodium phosphate in adults undergoing elective colonoscopy. METHODS : A total of 276 patients were randomized to receive an oral high-dose bisacodyl preparation (6 tablets of 5 mg bisacodyl) plus water lavage (2 L of water) or an oral sodium phosphate (NaP) preparation (90 mL in divided doses). All endoscopic procedures were conducted in the afternoon. The endoscopist was blinded to the preparation the patient had received and graded the quality of colon cleansing as excellent, good, fair, poor, or failed. Patients’ demographic data, indications for the procedure, and colonoscopic findings were recorded and compared. RESULTS : Significantly improved (p < 0.001) bowel preparation after NaP compared with bisacodyl plus water lavage was reported. The completion rate of colonoscopy was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the bisacodyl group (70.6%) than in the NaP group (92.9%). The detection of polyps was significantly increased (p = 0.017) in the NaP group (43.1%) compared with the bisacodyl group (27.1%). A procedural indication of constipation was an independent predictor of failed preparation in the bisacodyl group (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.9–12.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION : The quality of bowel preparation with oral NaP was better than that with bisacodyl plus water lavage. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。