查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 跨機關合作中的政治與官僚辯證:「行政團隊」與「首長間信任建立」之意涵與困局
- 後冷戰時期美軍角色與任務的改變--組織程序與官僚政治對組織的影響
- State Policy and Guanxi Network Adaptation in China: Local Bureaucratic Rent-Seeking
- 超越「中西之間」
- 點名與簽到--明代京官朝參、公座文化的探索
- 印尼「新秩序」時期的威權政治機制與官僚政治
- 中共國防戰略決策模式芻議--以江澤民時期作分析驗證
- 政教關係與兩岸宗教交流:以兩岸媽祖廟團體為焦點
- 檢驗官僚政治理論與組織文化理論--以波斯灣戰爭期間美軍的空中運補能力為例
- 中共問題研究之方法論續探--派系模式理論解析
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 跨機關合作中的政治與官僚辯證:「行政團隊」與「首長間信任建立」之意涵與困局=The Dilemma of Politics and Administration in Cross-agency Cooperation: Exploring the Meanings and Barriers of the Administrative Team and the Trust-building among Political Executives |
---|---|
作 者 | 曾冠球; 江明修; | 書刊名 | 國家與社會 |
卷 期 | 8 2010.06[民99.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-45 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 行政團隊; 首長間信任建立; 官僚政治; 跨機關合作; Administrative team; Political executives’ mutual trust; Bureaucratic politics; Cross-agency cooperation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 政府部門的「行政團隊」(administrative team)是「實 存」(reality)?還是「修辭」(rhetoric)?欲維繫一個行政團 隊,信任無疑是關鍵要素,首長間信任尤其具有影響力,並表現 在跨機關合作成果上。引人好奇的是:首長間是否容易與如何建 立互信關係?在這過程中可能遭遇哪些阻力?作者檢閱官僚研究 的重要文獻,並聚焦於政治任命者的組成關係,以及其等與常任 文官之間互動兩項議題,作為訪談資料的分析架構。研究發現顯 示,首長間信任並無法一廂情願地達成,在客觀因素制約下,首 長間信任經常面臨一些挑戰。其次,跨機關合作是一種多層次關 係,除了水平關係外,政治任命者仍須就部門立場與底下文官達 成共識,因此,政治任命者難以迴避「角色衝突」問題。面對上 述困境,當民選首長之行政領導力明顯不足時,則其對外所宣稱 的「行政團隊」,很可能只淪為一種政治修辭之用。 |
英文摘要 | Does “administrative team" in the government sector belong to a “reality" or “rhetoric"? Actually, trust is a key element of the teamwork; political executives' mutual trust particularly makes a great impact on the interagency cooperation. Against this background, we are curious about the following questions: for those political executives, if it is easy and how to build trust in their relationships? What factors might potentially hinder the possibilities for building trust among them? The author firstly reviewed crucial related researches in the fields of public bureaucracy, and then concentrated on two issues as a way to analyze the data: the composition of political appointees, and the interaction between the political executives and career civil servants. According to our findings, it reveals that political executives' mutual trust can't be built on his or her way. Within the context of the public sector, political executives' activities of trust-building often confront challenges. In addition, interagency cooperation is multi-layer relationships; that is, political appointees not only have to deal with the trust between the horizontal relationships but also have to achieve consensus with their subordinates on the basis of the agency's aim. Hence, it is difficult for political appointees to avoid “role conflicts". When facing such dilemma,the so called “administrative team" will become a political rhetoric if top elected politician can't exert administrative leadership well. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。