查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 運用鼻腔通氣管引流重症患者的水瀉與維持皮膚完整性之成效探討
- 腸皮瘻管之皮膚照護
- 採用鼻式持續正壓呼吸器早產兒皮膚受壓改善方案
- Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Hepatic Metastasis Presenting as Watery Diarrhea for about 1.5 Years: A Case Report
- 接受放射線治療病人皮膚臨床照護指引
- 糖尿病患者的皮膚照護
- 降低腹瀉病患臀部皮膚潰瘍之改善專案
- 降低重症病房腹瀉病人失禁性皮膚炎發生率
- 護理人員參與擬真情境放射線治療皮膚照護工作坊之學習成效研究
- 多媒體輔助教學介入對長期照護機構照顧服務員皮膚照護學習成效之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 運用鼻腔通氣管引流重症患者的水瀉與維持皮膚完整性之成效探討=The Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Airway to Contain Liquid Stool and Integrity of Skin in Critically Ill Patients |
---|---|
作 者 | 莊玟玲; | 書刊名 | Medical Journal of South Taiwan |
卷 期 | 5:2 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁75-81 |
分類號 | 419.73 |
關鍵詞 | 水瀉; 皮膚照護; 鼻腔通氣管; Diarrhea; Skin care; Nasopharyngeal airway; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:應用鼻腔通氣管的圓形端置入肛門,並且管路的末端連接引流袋,以引流患者的水瀉,並且探討其維持肛門會陰部之皮膚完整性的成效。方法:為前趨試驗之單組前後測設計,於南部某醫學中心之加護病房,以立意取樣選取60位解水瀉的患者。於管路置入前後,以結構式問卷收集資料。所收集的資料以描述性統計與Wilcoxon符號等級檢定,以及t檢定進行統計分析。結果:鼻腔通氣管的操作技術平均花費3.06分鐘(SD=4.19)。管路置入後,清潔的護理時數顯著降低(t=9.58, p < 0.001)。管路留置的時間平均4.68天(SD=3.62),平均每天可引流444.40 ml(SD=384.78)的糞便,管路旁僅有少量滲便。管路置入前後,100%的患者肛門會陰部皮膚維持完整或傷口未擴大(Z=-0.447, p=0.655),且無直腸黏膜受損。結論:雖然鼻腔通氣管的用途並非作為大便的引流,然而依研究結果建議日後可作為引流水瀉與保護皮膚的參考措施。 |
英文摘要 | Objective: This study was to explore the safety and efficacy of a nasopharyngeal airway within the rectum that connected a pouch for the containment of fecal.Methods: A pilot study in single-subject pre and post test with purposive sampling and 60 subjects with ongoing water diarrhea were recruited from intensive care units of a medical center in south. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data pre-insertion and post-removal. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, and t test was used to data analysis.Results: The results showed that the averaged time of inserted the nasopharyngeal airway was 3.06 (SD=4.19). Cleaning time was significant decreased (t=9.58, p <0.001). The average duration of use was 4.68 (SD=3.62) days. The mean containment of fecal was 444.40 (SD=384.78) ml. Minimal leakage was seen around the anus. 100% patients' perineal skin or wound conditions were maintained (Z=-0.447, p=0.655), and there was no anorectal mucosal injury noted.Conclusions: Although the nasopharyngeal airway was not original applied for a fecal containment device. However, the study results could be a reference for the containment of liquid stool and protect the skin. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。